[Bureau] Re: Speaking Slots - CSB Role

[veni markovski]

>As Sean correctly points out the crucial issue is to find a fair and 
>transparent way to prioritise and decide who is to speak.  CSB has been

It is MORE important to decide WHAT to speak, rather then who. I don't mind 
if I don't speak as long as the people who speak are giving good reasons to 
the audience.



>1. The current system is almost entirely dependent on being present at the 
>Prepcom and arguing your case in the caucuses.  Whilst this is apparently 
>democratic, in practice it is anarchaic - whoever shouts loudest or has 
>the most friends there tends to get to speak. It takes no

Not really. Y J Park for example is not shouting, and I don't think she has 
the most friends, yet she speaks for the so called "Internet governance 
caucus", and is member of the CSB as network and coaltions. And as long as 
we all agree what she speaks, I am fine.

>Whether or not John continues to chair the CSB is a red-herring and a 
>distraction from more important issues.

There is no such thing as a char of the CSB. And noone has taken a position 
that does NOT exist. Please, be more precise.

veni