[CS Bureau] WSIS: Informal consultation on 13 June

Robert Guerra rguerra at lists.privaterra.org
Mon Jun 6 18:29:02 BST 2005


Renata:

I wish to send the Group of friends of the chair the Civil Society  
Communiqué from the recent Canadian meeting on WSIS.  To whom shall I  
address the email so that the document is officially entered into the  
(WSIS) record?

regards

Robert



On 6-Jun-05, at 12:59 PM, Renata Bloem wrote:

> Dear all,
>
>
>
> Please find below and attached “Food for thought” document (so far  
> in English only) which will be the basis of discussion during the  
> Informal Consultation meeting on WSIS implementation and follow-up,  
> Monday 13 June 2005. The meeting will be held in room XXVI at the  
> Palais des Nations, Geneva
>
>
>
> With best regards,
>
> Renata
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> “Food for thought” for the informal consultations on WSIS  
> implementation and follow-up
>
> Prepared by WSIS PrepCom Chair, H.E. Ambassador Janis Karklins  
> (Latvia)
>
>
>
> Proposed mandate for Group of Friends of the Chair (GFC)
>
> 1.           At its meeting on 13 May, the WSIS Bureau decided to  
> continue the work of the Group of Friends of the Chair (GFC) during  
> the inter-sessional period between PrepCom-2 and 3, on a similar  
> basis to that which was carried out between PrepCom 1 and 2, when  
> the GFC held four meetings.
>
> 2.           In line with the Decision of PrepCom-2 (WSIS-II/PC-2/ 
> DOC/13 rev. 1), the GFC should continue to draft proposals on  
> implementation mechanisms (para 10-11 of chapter one of the  
> operational part) and on the way ahead (chapter four, para 26-29).
>
> 3.           These new proposals will be in addition to the written  
> comments and proposals presented during the first reading of the  
> operational part on 21 February, contained in the compilation  
> documents on chapter one (DT-2 Rev. 2) and chapter four (DT-5)  
> respectively. The compilation document of new proposals received by  
> 31 May 2005 will be issued as a reference document prior to the  
> PrepCom-3, and these proposals will be examined by the GFC. They  
> will also be posted on the WSIS website.
>
>
>
> Tentative workplan for the GFC
>
>              The following suggestions are made on the timetable  
> for the work of the GFC.
>
> Monday 13 June (just ahead of WGIG)
>
> Day-long informal consultations in room XXVI of Palais des Nations,  
> open to all stakeholders, which should provide an opportunity for  
> an informal exchange of views on implementation and follow-up.
>
> Monday 27 June (just ahead of the WSIS Thematic Meeting on  
> Cybersecurity)
>
> The GFC could hold its fifth session, to consider new proposals on  
> implementation and follow-up.
>
> Monday 4 July
>
> The GFC could hold its sixth session, to consider new proposals on  
> implementation and follow-up.
>
> Monday 11 July (just ahead of ITU Council)
>
> The GFC could hold its seventh session, to consider new proposals  
> on implementation and follow-up.
>
> Tuesday 19th July (if required, just after presentation of WGIG  
> report. Alternatively, on 18 July, following presentation of WGIG  
> report, if time permits).
>
> A second round of informal consultations, open to all stakeholders,  
> could be held to review the proposals on implementation and follow-up.
>
>
> Possible principles to guide WSIS implementation and follow-up
>
>              The following principles are offered for discussion:
>
> 1).    The implementation and follow-up should be based on multi- 
> stakeholder partnership. It should be a decentralized, transparent,  
> inclusive and open process.
>
> 2).    “Implementation” is the series of concerted actions taken by  
> all stakeholders to implement the provisions of the Plan of Action,  
> at national, regional and international levels. Information on  
> implementation should be reported periodically to ECOSOC/UN General  
> Assembly.
>
> 3).    “Follow-up” entails a political debate on WSIS-related  
> issues, involving the UN family and other stakeholders, leading to  
> appropriate policy recommendations.
>
> 4).    Implementation and follow-up of Internet Governance would be  
> separate from that for other WSIS-related issues.
>
> 5).    Implementation would be structured according to the action  
> lines set out in the Plan of Action.
>
> a.       At the national level, implementation requires a  
> structured dialogue involving all relevant stakeholders, including  
> public/private partnerships, in devising e-strategies for the  
> Information Society and for the exchange of best practices;
>
> b.       At the international level, multi-stakeholder teams could  
> be established to moderate implementation for each of the action  
> lines;
>
> c.       Participation in the multi-stakeholder teams should be  
> voluntary, inclusive and based on partnership among governments and  
> all stakeholders;
>
> d.       Each of the multi-stakeholder teams, at the international  
> level, would be moderated by one or more UN agencies, in line with  
> their competencies and mandates;
>
> e.       The responsibilities of the moderators would include  
> establishing a forum for information exchange, both online and  
> through physical meetings, and making periodic reports;
>
> f.        In order to avoid duplication of efforts and redundancy,  
> a coordination of activities all multi-stakeholder implementing  
> teams is needed. An overall coordinator role for the national  
> dialogues and multi-stakeholder teams may be taken, on a co-chair  
> or rotating basis, by the main relevant UN agencies (e.g., ITU,  
> UNESCO, UNDP). This should be a light-touch function, intended  
> primarily for the purposes of information gathering and exchange,  
> avoidance of duplication, as well as consolidated reporting;
>
> g.       The overall moderator/coordinator would be responsible for  
> transmitting periodic reports to the UN Secretary-General’s Office  
> for submission to ECOSOC/UN General Assembly. This information  
> reporting function would encompass the periodic reports on the  
> stocktaking of WSIS-related activities.
>
> 6).    Follow-up (policy debate)
>
> a.       In line with UN Resolution 59/220, the Secretary-General  
> of ITU would transmit to the UN General Assembly the report of the  
> WSIS, as soon as it is available;
>
> b.       Thereafter, the UN Secretary-General would make periodic  
> reports on WSIS implementation to the UN General Assembly;
>
> c.       In line with UN Resolution 57/270, follow-up within the UN  
> family would be in line with the existing practices for integrated  
> coordination and follow-up of the outcomes of major UN conferences  
> and summits;
>
> d.       The overarching principle should be to continue the multi- 
> stakeholder approach that has characterized all work carried out to  
> date in the WSIS process. Continuous involvement of all  
> stakeholders in the policy discussion after Tunis Summit is  
> essential and modalities of such participation should be established.
>
>
>
> With best regards,
>
> Renata
>
>
>
> Renate Bloem
> President of the Conference of NGOs (CONGO)
> 11, Avenue de la Paix
> CH-1202 Geneva
> Tel: +41 22 301 1000
> Fax: +41 22 301 2000
> E-mail: rbloem at ngocongo.org
> Website: www.ngocongo.org
>
>
>
> The Conference of NGOs (CONGO) is an international, membership  
> association that facilitates the participation of NGOs in United  
> Nations debates and decisions. Founded in 1948, CONGO's major  
> objective is to ensure the presence of NGOs in exchanges among the  
> world's governments and United Nations agencies on issues of global  
> concern.  For more information see our website at www.ngocongo.org
>
>
>
> <Food for thought document (6 6 05).doc>




--
------------------------ [ SECURITY NOTICE ] ------------------------
To: bureau at wsis-cs.org, rbloem at ngocongo.org.
For your security, rguerra at lists.privaterra.org
digitally signed this message on 06 June 2005 at 17:29:08 UTC.
Verify this digital signature at http://www.ciphire.com/verify.
------------------- [ CIPHIRE DIGITAL SIGNATURE ] -------------------
Q2lwaGlyZSBTaWcuAVdidXJlYXVAd3Npcy1jcy5vcmcsIHJibG9lbUBuZ29jb25nby5vc
mcAcmd1ZXJyYUBsaXN0cy5wcml2YXRlcnJhLm9yZwBlbWFpbCBib2R5ANgXAAB8AHwAAA
ABAAAA5IekQtgXAAC9AwACAAIAAgAg/UWVg4JqRSzLOJXpPLgdqS2acp8u7u306ule1pN
oJZYBACALO1cghLsRjJ1TYTOmXkWEk9XHLe3u10VKemT9j7voMo09m05zRkospZ/dC2Y+
HlT3qw+hp2PqQu5zk1oRZ8wDPS1uU2lnRW5k
--------------------- [ END DIGITAL SIGNATURE ] ---------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/pipermail/bureau/attachments/20050606/bdf3e63e/attachment.html


More information about the Bureau mailing list