[Lac] [Fwd: Re: [governance] Re: [wsis-gc] [WSIS CS-Plenary] Call for Comments: Draft YC Input toWGIG Sept Consultation (fwd)]

[Beatriz Busaniche]

reenvio algo de información del caucus de governance.
y repito preguntas: qué opina el caucus sobre esto?


cariños
Bea


-----Mensaje reenviado-----
From: veni markovski <veni at veni.com>
To: avri at acm.org, governance at lists.cpsr.org
Subject: Re: [governance] Re: [wsis-gc] [WSIS CS-Plenary] Call for Comments: Draft YC Input toWGIG Sept Consultation (fwd)
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 17:59:04 +0300

It's a proof that the process is a total mess. There are 20+ caucuses, and 
each of them feels obliged to propose at least 10 names. That makes 200 
people!?

I don't think anyone would consider the civil society input as constructive 
at this point.

best,
veni



At 10:40 13-09-2004 -0400, avri at acm.org wrote:

>On 13 sep 2004, at 02.48, Lettie Longwe wrote:
>
>>
>>Thank you so much for the information below. The WSIS Gender is in the 
>>process of submitting nominations for the WGIG and we have no major 
>>changes to suggest to the attached draft.
>>
>
>I am curious, which Gender caucus is doing this.  I am on the Gender 
>Caucus (wsis-gc at genderwsis.org) mailing list and have not seen any 
>discussion of nominations.
>
>aa.
>
>_______________________________________________
>governance mailing list
>governance at lists.cpsr.org
>https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance

_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance