[Mmwg] Important : procedure for runoff election

[Luc Faubert]

Our charter says "Chairs can either be designated by consensus of the MMWG or by a 2/3 vote." So if we want to go by the book, unless we can reach consensus on another chair I think we should vote until another candidate gathers 2/3 of the votes -- or change our charter.
 
Now I'm not sure I understand Bertrand's proposal. What happens in the case we have the following situation where V are voters and A, B and C the 3 candidates ?
 
V ABC
1 xx
2  xx
3 x x
4 xx 
 
 
- Luc Faubert
ISOC Québec
 

________________________________

From: mmwg-bounces at wsis-cs.org on behalf of Jacqueline Morris
Sent: Thu 2006-02-16 07:14
To: Vittorio Bertola
Cc: mmwg at wsis-cs.org
Subject: Re: [Mmwg] Important : procedure for runoff election


Ok - sorry.
Can we have some discussion on this until the 18th, then?


On 2/16/06, Vittorio Bertola <vb at bertola.eu.org > wrote: 

	Bertrand de La Chapelle ha scritto:
	> Dear Jacqueline,
	>
	> I am a bit sad. I made a very simple and argumeted proposal for this
	> second round, suggesting that we allow for two votes instead of one
	> only. Justification is reiterated below in the copy of my previous mail. 
	>
	> Unfortunately, you are calling for a second round of elections with the
	> traditional single vote rule, without any mention of the alternative. I
	> suppose you and others simply did not notice my mail in the flurry of 
	> exchanges. This is OK . I trust you.
	
	Actually, I thought that it was so clear that your suggestion was a good
	one that it didn't need explicit support, but if it needs some, here is
	mine.
	--
	vb.             [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<-----
	http://bertola.eu.org/  <- Prima o poi...
	




-- 
Jacqueline Morris 
www.carnivalondenet.com
T&T Music and videos online 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/pipermail/mmwg/attachments/20060216/7e90296f/attachment.html