[Mmwg] Suggestion for consultation

[karen banks]

agree - i think it worked well (i believe we have all spoken now ;)

bill, milton, wolfgang, jeanette, izumi, karen, vittorio, rikke all 
made interventions, largely coordinated in terms of covering as much 
as possible..

karen

At 16:11 16/02/2006, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
>carlos a. afonso ha scritto:
>>In my view, the caucus declaration read today by Jeanette, and the APC
>>response to the IGF questionnaire (and presented also today by Karen B),
>>are what could be done on the part of CS in time for this initial
>
>FYI, we had a quick IG caucus meeting at lunch, in which everyone 
>said what they planned to say in their interventions, we sorted out 
>duplications, had a brief discussion to focalize ideas, and then 
>agreed that all of us would speak trying to both reiterate key 
>points generally agreed, and bring new hues into the debate.
>I think that in terms of result it is a success, much better than 
>when Jeanette/Adam were reading a pre-packaged document that took 
>days to agree on, and that was often forced towards a lowest common 
>denominator. I like this modality more, even when we disagree (we 
>said some contradictory things in our statements, but I think that 
>this enriches the discussion rather than disturbing it).
>--
>vb.             [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<-----
>http://bertola.eu.org/  <- Prima o poi...
>_______________________________________________
>mmwg mailing list
>mmwg at wsis-cs.org
>http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mmwg