[Mmwg] Important : procedure for runoff election

[Max Senges]

i am fine either way - but i suggest to go ahead with jacqueline's proposal
and try out bertrand's proposal next time.

it's a matter of practicality now
max <--has voted already :-)


On 2/16/06, Max Senges <maxsenges at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> i am fine either way - but i suggest to go ahead with jacqueline's
> proposal and try out bertrand's proposal next time.
>
> it's a matter of practicality now
> max <--has voted already :-)
>
>  On 2/16/06, carlos a. afonso <ca at rits.org.br> wrote:
> >
> > Don't do this, Avri, please! Leave it to certain politicians... :)
> >
> > --c.a.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Avri Doria <avri at psg.com>
> > To: Bertrand de La Chapelle <bdelachapelle at gmail.com>
> > Cc: mmwg at wsis-cs.org
> > Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:10:15 +0100
> > Subject: Re: [Mmwg] Important : procedure for runoff election
> >
> > [...]
> > > i would have to 'buy' another election, so to speak.
> > >
> > > a.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mmwg mailing list
> > mmwg at wsis-cs.org
> > http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mmwg
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/pipermail/mmwg/attachments/20060216/9bf2ecdb/attachment.html