VS: [Mmwg] IGF Input

[Milton Mueller]

>>> Wolfgang Kleinwächter 
>Could we agree to propose in the statement
>A. a "Programme Committee" and
>B. (at a later stage) a "Facilitation Group".
> 
>A would be responsible to prepare the F2F event
>B would be responsible to facilitate the discussion within the process, >that is between the big F2F event. 

Are they different groups completely? If so, I think it's too complicated and we lack to resources and bandwidth to carry it out. 
 
>The establishment of "e Internet Governance Working Groups" 
>(e-IGWGs) should be "bottom up". Everybody should be free 
>within the framework of certain criteria (which have to be defined)
> to establish an e-IGWG but it would need the "approval" by the 
>PC (later the FG). 

later? so there is a sequence to these things

>Criteria for recognition of e-IGWGs could be

This is outside the scope of the Feb. 28 deadline, so can we drop it?