AW: [Mmwg] IGF mechanism 5.0

[Robert Guerra]

Wolfgang:

thanks for reminding us of para 33 :) If I recall well it was  
formulated at PC3 (sept 05) and took some while to get agreement on  
(I remember, as was present in the subcommittee room...)



regards,

Robert

--
Robert Guerra <rguerra at privaterra.org>
Managing Director, Privaterra
Tel +1 416 893 0377 Fax +1 416 893 0374


On 20-Jan-06, at 10:25 PM, Wolfgang Kleinwächter wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> as a latecomer of the list, probably I repeat something, which has  
> been already said. So forgive me if it is redundant.
>
> With regard to the participation of individuals as recognized and  
> accredited "experts", I would refer to Paragraph 33 of the WGIG  
> report which says:
>
> 33.      Furthermore, the WGIG recognized that the contribution to  
> the Internet of the academic community is very valuable and  
> constitutes one of its main sources of inspiration, innovation and  
> creativity. Similarly, the technical community and its  
> organizations are deeply involved in Internet operation, Internet  
> standard-setting and Internet services development. Both of these  
> groups make a permanent and valuable contribution to the stability,  
> security, functioning and evolution of the Internet. They interact  
> extensively with and within all stakeholder groups.
>
> The Idea behind para 33 was, that members of the academic and  
> technical community (this are the so-called experts) constitute  
> something like a "horizontal 4th stakeholder" group which is mainly  
> rooted in the civil society but works together sometimes as  
> advisers with governments or as consultants with the private  
> sector. With para. 33 the only thing an individual would have to  
> demonstrate his/her affiliation with an academic or technical group  
> (which can be interpreted in a broad and flexible way).
>
> Best regards
>
> wolfgang
>
> ________________________________
>
> Von: mmwg-bounces at wsis-cs.org im Auftrag von Jaeyoun Kim (Peter)
> Gesendet: Sa 21.01.2006 02:09
> An: Yulia Timofeeva
> Cc: mmwg at wsis-cs.org
> Betreff: Re: [Mmwg] IGF mechanism 5.0
>
>
>
> This sounds good.
>
> It might be a compromise solution for individuals to participate in  
> IGF.
>
>
> Regards,
> Jaeyoun Kim (Peter)
>
> On 1/21/06, Yulia Timofeeva <airetg at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Actually it could develop in a workable solution. Since many  
>> parties are
>> reluctant to see individuals participating as "individuals" we  
>> could think
>> of some special name for them ("experts" or something else) so  
>> that it would
>> be clear for everyone that it's not just any person from the street.
>> Then of course we have to offer some criteria or procedure to make  
>> sure that
>> the person deserves the title.
>>
>> Yulia
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/20/06, Avri Doria <avri at psg.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 20 jan 2006, at 16.27, Danny Younger wrote:
>>>
>>>> As a way to bridge the gap between our positions,
>>>> would you perhaps feel more comfortable creating an
>>>> accreditation category for known "experts" that would
>>>> allow such contributors to pass readily through the
>>>> front door?
>>>
>>> i tend to support the idea of enabling individuals to participate.
>>> but i have an issue with figuring out how one defines, identifies  
>>> and
>>> accredits 'experts' and would not be happy to see it limited to  
>>> experts.
>>>
>>> a.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mmwg mailing list
>>> mmwg at wsis-cs.org
>>> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mmwg
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mmwg mailing list
>> mmwg at wsis-cs.org
>> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mmwg
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> mmwg mailing list
> mmwg at wsis-cs.org
> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mmwg
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmwg mailing list
> mmwg at wsis-cs.org
> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mmwg