[Mmwg] Reviewing the discussions

[Vittorio Bertola]

Il giorno lun, 23/01/2006 alle 15.21 -0500, Milton Mueller ha scritto:
> There is some debate about the composition and powers of the Plenary.
> Here is where things get confusing. Vittorio does not like the idea
> that the Plenary-Chair interaction approves reports. But he proposes
> no concrete modifications, he only makes vague references to dividing
> the plenary by sector. It is not clear from his comments what powers
> he wants the plenary to have. It is not clear from his comments who
> should be on the Bureau or how they get there.

Uhm, pardon me if I did not submit a 10-page Bylaws draft :-)
In any case, my main modifications would be:
- appointing WG Chairs and adopting documents falls within the mandate
of the Bureau (I would rename it to something less bureaucratic,
please!)
- initially, the Bureau is appointed by Annan with balanced
representation among the 3 stakeholder groups (WGIG-like)
- then, each of the groups comes up with proposals on how to select
future Bureau members, which are to be adopted by the Bureau
Is this clear enough?
-- 
vb.             [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<-----
http://bertola.eu.org/  <- Prima o poi...