[Mmwg] adopting reports

[McTim]

On 1/26/06, William Drake <drake at hei.unige.ch> wrote:
> MM,
>
> > I think what both Luc and I had in mind was a process whereby a
> > WG plunks a report on the table, gets it on the agenda, and then
> > Plenary reacts to it. They do not "edit" it, they do not go
> > through it line by line, etc. They do not wordsmith. They
> > deliberate. They discuss what is missing, what is agreeable and
> > disagreeable, what is misinterpreted, etc. If there is no rough
> > consensus on publication the WG has to make changes. And subsets
> > of Plenary could submit proposals for specific changes to the WG.
>
> I don't see why the Plenary has to approve it.

Agreed.  Pls see next mail for more.

--
Cheers,

McTim
$ whois -h whois.afrinic.net mctim