<div>Greetings; nice place to be, interesting posts, and just wondering.</div>
<div> </div>
<div><font size="1">Referring to:</font></div>
<div><font size="1"></font> </div>
<div><font size="1"><begin quote> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -</font></div>
<div><font size="1"><font color="#550055">On 14 dec 2005, at 10.53, Max Senges wrote:<br><br>> - figure out what our immediate agenda is, e.g.:<br>> - MSH discussion and description?<br>> [Max] sorry but what is MSH ?- mission statement?
<br><br><br><span></span></font>sorry, multistakeholder. this is one of the terms we use a lot, but<br>has never had a real working definition. i think that having MSH as<br>our goal and the motivation for our recommendations, we should have a
<br>clear view of what it means and what the scope is.<br></font><span class="sg"><br></span><font size="1"><end quote>-</font> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -</div>
<div> </div>
<div>LDMF Comment and Query:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>A recurring typology of who is "in the set" of multistakeholders goes something like: </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Governments, Civil Society including but not only Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), Private Sector, Parliamentarians. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Perhaps I missed one or two (?), but for purposes of discussion and without nominating this as the only possible top level list of course, what might you think of adding: </div>
<div> </div>
<div><strong>Individuals.</strong></div>
<div> </div>
<div>[And all that might entail]</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Sending best professional and personal regards, Linda M F.</div>
<div>Dr. L. D. Misek-Falkoff</div>
<div>*Respectful Interfaces.* <br> </div>