<div>Hi,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Count me on for 10 $ like Adam. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Drinks in Malta in addition :-)</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Bertrand<br><br> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 2/8/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Adam Peake (<a href="mailto:ajp@glocom.ac.jp">ajp@glocom.ac.jp</a>)</b> <<a href="mailto:apeake@gmail.com">apeake@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Count me in for $10 (to 1st or 2nd round costs.)<br><br>And if these things need money, then let's talk about how to find cash
<br>(limited, operational costs to start, round the world travel comes<br>later.)<br><br>Adam<br><br><br>On 2/9/06, Jeanette Hofmann <<a href="mailto:jeanette@wz-berlin.de">jeanette@wz-berlin.de</a>> wrote:<br>> Congrats, Jacqueline!
<br>><br>><br>> Max Senges wrote:<br>> > Congratulations Jacqueline<br>> ><br>> > Now that we have started to vote, I think we should go all the way and do<br>> > the second round.<br>>
<br>> Since Avri doesn't mention it: voting with this system isn't free. It<br>> costs close to $40 IIRC. Avri has paid for it. I don't think she should<br>> bear the costs for a second round.<br>><br>> jeanette
<br>><br>> ><br>> > max<br>> ><br>> > -----Original Message-----<br>> > From: <a href="mailto:mmwg-bounces@wsis-cs.org">mmwg-bounces@wsis-cs.org</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:mmwg-bounces@wsis-cs.org">
mmwg-bounces@wsis-cs.org</a>] On Behalf<br>> > Of Avri Doria<br>> > Sent: miércoles, 08 de febrero de 2006 13:19<br>> > To: <a href="mailto:mmwg@wsis-cs.org">mmwg@wsis-cs.org</a><br>> > Subject: [Mmwg] Results of the Election
<br>> ><br>> > Hi,<br>> ><br>> > Ok, I believe that at this point, the election of the co-chairs have<br>> > ended.<br>> ><br>> > 22 out of 35 people voted.<br>> ><br>> > The results:
<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > David Allen (8 votes) - 36% of those voting<br>> > Robert Guerra 18.18% - (8 votes) - 36% of those voting<br>> > Wolfgang Kleinwachter (12 votes) 55% of those voting<br>
> > Jacqueline Morris (16 votes) 73% of those voting<br>> ><br>> > By the requirements in the charter it takes 2/3 (67%) vote to be<br>> > elected.<br>> ><br>> > So Jacqueline is definitely elected as one of the two co-chairs.
<br>> > Congratulations and thanks.<br>> ><br>> > At this point, while Wolfgang has a majority vote, he does not have 67%.<br>> ><br>> > Aand I am not sure what to do. Do we need to have a runoff election,
<br>> > or is there a chance we can reach consensus. Please let the list<br>> > know. In the meantime, Jacqueline is a chair of the group. And if<br>> > she (and the groups) wants I will assist her while we are trying to
<br>> > resolve the co-chair issue.<br>> ><br>> > -------<br>> ><br>> > Obviously, this first experiment at voting leaves some learning to be<br>> > done. In addition to not having reached a full 2/3 on the vote for
<br>> > one of the candidates, I received some other comments.<br>> ><br>> > - Instead of forcing everyone to vote for 2 people perhaps it should<br>> > have been set up for up to 2 votes.<br>> >
<br>> > - should be using open source facilities instead of a .com commercial<br>> > facility. Note I could not find any open source based facility but<br>> > would surely prefer to have used such a system.
<br>> ><br>> > - people's passwords should have been auto-generated instead of my<br>> > sending them out to people. I do assure you all that I did not abuse<br>> > my having access to all the passwords. Also, for their to be auto-
<br>> > generation of passwords, it would have been necessary to give out<br>> > people's email addresses, which opens up a spam risk. This should be<br>> > discussed further.<br>> ><br>> > - I should have included candidate biographic information for those
<br>> > who don't know everyone.<br>> ><br>> > - Nomination process should have been clearer and more formalized<br>> ><br>> > These comments are all valid and merit discussion, especially in
<br>> > terms of any recommendations the Wg might make that include voting<br>> > mechanisms for any of the follow-on mechanisms.<br>> ><br>> > thanks to all those who voted and commented.<br>> >
<br>> > a.<br>> ><br>> > ex MMWG coordinator<br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > _______________________________________________<br>> > mmwg mailing list<br>
> > <a href="mailto:mmwg@wsis-cs.org">mmwg@wsis-cs.org</a><br>> > <a href="http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mmwg">http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mmwg</a><br>> ><br>
> > _______________________________________________<br>> > mmwg mailing list<br>> > <a href="mailto:mmwg@wsis-cs.org">mmwg@wsis-cs.org</a><br>> > <a href="http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mmwg">
http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mmwg</a><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> mmwg mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:mmwg@wsis-cs.org">mmwg@wsis-cs.org</a><br>> <a href="http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mmwg">
http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mmwg</a><br>><br><br><br>--<br>Email from Adam Peake <<a href="mailto:ajp@glocom.ac.jp">ajp@glocom.ac.jp</a>><br>Email from my Gmail account probably means I am travelling. Please
<br>reply to <<a href="mailto:ajp@glocom.ac.jp">ajp@glocom.ac.jp</a>> Thanks!<br>_______________________________________________<br>mmwg mailing list<br><a href="mailto:mmwg@wsis-cs.org">mmwg@wsis-cs.org</a><br><a href="http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mmwg">
http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mmwg</a><br></blockquote></div><br>