<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>Salut cher ami</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Nous vous remercions pour le courrier mais nous vous prions de nous ecrire en franēais car nous ne maitrisons rien en anglais</DIV>
<DIV>merci pour la comprehention</DIV></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><BR><BR><B><I>Bertrand de LA CHAPELLE <lachapelle@openwsis.org></I></B> wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">Hi, follow-up on Chun's report<BR><BR>In the absence of any other active member of the civil <BR>society caucus on internet governance, and given the <BR>urgency, I indeed issued a statement in the name of civil <BR>society on two levels :<BR><BR>- lightly on the substance to remind present governments of <BR>what we had circulated before (ie : refusal of an <BR>intergovernmental process and insistence on dealing with <BR>this issue between Geneva and Tunis in a manner that <BR>associates all stakeholders)<BR>- more precisely on the question of the openness of these <BR>working groups, to submit a proposal (see below) that had <BR>been informally discussed with some members of CS plenary <BR>and CS bureau; this proposal was distributed in writing to <BR>the chair (Kenya) and also - at their request - to the <BR>governments who had expressed their discontent with the fact <BR>t
hat
these meetings were going to be closed. <BR><BR>Further discussions have taken place with Lindall Shope-<BR>Mafole (chair of the drafting committee) and some friendly <BR>delegations. This issue is likely to be addressed in the <BR>governmental bureau this evening. <BR><BR>Proposed formula is :<BR><BR>1 ā€“ these working groups should be as open as possible <BR><BR>2 ā€“ their methodology may vary, depending on the issues <BR>adressed<BR><BR>3 ā€“ to facilitate the most efficient interaction between the <BR>different stakeholders, each chair / facilitator will have <BR>the responsibility to use in a balanced proportion the <BR>following three modes of interaction :<BR>- observers will have the right to make short statements on <BR>the issue and to submit them in written form for all <BR>governmental delegations to take them into account as they <BR>see fit<BR>- further interaction with observers will be possible at the <BR>discretion of th
e chair
or at the request of one governement<BR>- a ā€œsilent modeā€ will allow observers to remain in the room <BR>without being further allowed to participate in the <BR>discussion <BR><BR>Bertrand<BR><BR><BR>---- Original message ----<BR>>Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 21:57:33 +0900 (KST)<BR>>From: Chun Eung Hwi <CHUN@PEACENET.OR.KR><BR>>Subject: [WSIS CS-Plenary] 2nd Unofficial personal report <BR>of Government meeting <BR>>To: plenary@wsis-cs.org, <CT@WSIS-CS.ORG><BR>><BR>>For the negotiation of conflicting views on some <BR>contentious issues, <BR>>governments decided to make six working group depending on <BR>those issues <BR>>such as Right to communicate, Internet Security, Internet <BR>Governance, <BR>>Enabling environment, Cultural identity, Media and Freedom <BR>of expression. <BR>><BR>>This afternoon, I attended to one working group of Internet <BR>Governance. <BR>>Then, there I heard that in the morning session, some <BR>co
untries
raised<BR>>questions on the attendance of civil society and private <BR>sector. So, they<BR>>decided their policy to allow only five minutes for civil <BR>society and<BR>>private sector to speak out their concerns and to make them <BR>leave from<BR>>meeting place when governments begin to negotiate. Only two <BR>minutes was<BR>>allowed to those groups. One person of Private sector spoke <BR>out the<BR>>importance of private sector initiative and the cooperation <BR>between<BR>>private sector and governments in internet governance. And <BR>nobody made a<BR>>comment from civil society group.<BR>><BR>>However, EU representative, Norway, Israel and the U.S <BR>expressed their<BR>>uncomfortableness to that policy. But the chair said that <BR>he has no right<BR>>to reverse that policy. So, I should have left out from the <BR>meeting place. <BR>>That's it.<BR>><BR>>At the meeting place, I met Mr. Mohamed Sharil Tarmizi, the <BR>chair
of<BR>>GAC(Government Advisory Committee) of ICANN and Paul <BR>Twomey, President/CEO<BR>>of ICANN and Theresa Swinehart, Counsel of ICANN. But Paul <BR>and Theresa<BR>>should also have left out.<BR>><BR>><BR>>-- <BR>>------------------------------------------------------------<BR>>Chun Eung Hwi<BR>>General Secretary, PeaceNet | phone: (+82) 2-2166-2205<BR>>Seoul Yangchun P.O.Box 81 | pcs: (+82) 019-259-2667<BR>>Seoul, 158-600, Korea | eMail: <BR>chun@peacenet.or.kr<BR>>------------------------------------------------------------<BR>><BR>>_______________________________________________<BR>>Plenary mailing list<BR>>Plenary@wsis-cs.org<BR>>http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary<BR>>W§j¼¦j)bž b²Óåzv«Ė "±Ė(®m¶Ÿ’™Ø„™©ą­ē§ėh® ¤žf¢–f§žX¬¶)ߣśezv«</BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><p><br><hr size=1>Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en franēais !<br>
<a href=http://fr.mail.yahoo.com>Testez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail</a>