<DIV>Btw: The "SWOT" type analysis which I mentioned yesterday, to the plenary list, would then be a stage two for CS.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Amali<BR><BR><B><I>Amali De Silva <amalidesilva@yahoo.com></I></B> wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">
<DIV>I think it is best to stick to some simple but basic "musts / wants " at this stage.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>1. Inclusivity of CS members in all relevant consultations / opportunity for CS to speak</DIV>
<DIV>2. Access to information and meetings</DIV>
<DIV>3. Ensure ( no charge ) on-line access at all meetings and conferences for CS</DIV>
<DIV>4. Physical meeting space at meetings and conferences plus translation facilities</DIV>
<DIV>5. Reasonable budget for WSIS-CS authorised print materials / documents</DIV>
<DIV>6. Opportunity for holding press conferences as in Geneva</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Amali De Silva - Mitchell </DIV>
<DIV><BR><BR><B><I>Robert Guerra <rguerra@cpsr.org></I></B> wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">I do remind everyone the following i mentioned a few days ago.. that the <BR>informal meeting in Tunis is NEXT week. Consequently,<BR><BR><BR>* it would be a good idea to have those that are attending relay a <BR>message from the plenary and/or CT group. what that message is, well - <BR>that i'll leave to discussion.<BR><BR><BR>* as mentioned by mereym and others, we need to come up with a consensus <BR>on where we stand in regards to the CSB.<BR><BR><BR>we must recognize the fact that certain governments and the summit <BR>organizers might be seeing the CSB, and those who are listed as it's <BR>members as empowered to give ideas and/or represent civil society in <BR>some capacity.<BR><BR>One of the shortcoming of the CSB since it was setup at PC2 is that <BR>there are few, if any authoritative documents which clearly establish <BR>the CSB rules of procedure, conduct of it's
representatives and what <BR>actions it is empowered (and not) it can engage in.<BR><BR>I would put it to the plenary that this is something that needs <BR>immediate attention. Might it be too much to ask to create a <BR>subcommittee where lawyers, drafters,governance experts and others in <BR>Civil Society could start collaborating to create a set of guidelines <BR>for the CSB, and perhaps other structures which we have created.<BR><BR>We can discuss what's wrong, which is fine - but let's do something <BR>about. would that not be better?<BR><BR><BR>regards<BR><BR>Robert<BR>_______________________________________________<BR>Plenary mailing list<BR>Plenary@wsis-cs.org<BR>http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary</BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<P><STRONG>Amali De Silva-Mitchell MSc.</STRONG></P>
<P>Tel: 1-604-736-9012 & Email: <A href="mailto:amalidesilva@yahoo.com">amalidesilva@yahoo.com</A></P>
<P> </P>
<P><EM><FONT face=Verdana size=1></FONT></EM> </P>
<P> </P></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR><DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<P><STRONG>Amali De Silva-Mitchell MSc.</STRONG></P>
<P>Tel: 1-604-736-9012 & Email: <A href="mailto:amalidesilva@yahoo.com">amalidesilva@yahoo.com</A></P>
<P> </P>
<P><EM><FONT face=Verdana size=1></FONT></EM> </P>
<P> </P></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV>