<P>Dear Wolfgang and Djilali</P>
<P>The ITU Council meeting is a "closed meeting" allowing only elected Members (representatives of the 46 States elected during the 2002 Plenipotentiary Conference) to participate actively. Other ITU Members could be "onlookers". But of course other "onlookers" are forbidden there.(if you want to know more abour the ITU's functioning please see <A href="http://www.csdptt.org">www.csdptt.org</A> : l'UIT : la vieille dame des télécommunications) </P>
<P>That's why on behalf of CSDPTT I asked the CS Plenary as soon as PrepCom-1 to demand that the ITU Secretary general admits CS WSIS accredited organisations as members -or at least as acknowledged observers- of the Development Sector of ITU (ITU-D). However this proposal was not accepted by the CS majority, including Wolgang and others. I nevertheless presented this proposal to the intergouvernmental plenary at PrepCom-2 with no more success as you can notice it two years later. That's why I will represent it on the monday ITU meeting. </P>
<P>In effect, the monday afternoon meeting is "informal" and CS representatives are allowed to participate (I don't know if tere is a "numerus clausus") if they are registered previously (<A href="mailto:jaroslav.ponder@itu.int">jaroslav.ponder@itu.int</A>). </P>
<P>Best regards</P>
<P>Jean-Louis Fullsack. <BR><BR><BR><BR><BR></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #ff0000 2px solid">> Message du 28/04/05 15:58<BR>> De : "Wolfgang Kleinwächter" <WOLFGANG.KLEINWAECHTER@MEDIENKOMM.UNI-HALLE.DE><BR>> A : plenary@wsis-cs.org, plenary@wsis-cs.org<BR>> Copie à : <BR>> Objet : AW: AW: [WSIS CS-Plenary] Clarifications on the ITU informal consultation on WSIS implimentation<BR>> <BR>> My understanding is that ITU meeting is for members only. But it would be good test ti fugure out whether they allow onlookers.<BR>> <BR>> best<BR>> <BR>> w<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> ________________________________<BR>> <BR>> Von: plenary-admin@wsis-cs.org im Auftrag von djilali benamrane<BR>> Gesendet: Do 28.04.2005 15:44<BR>> An: plenary@wsis-cs.org<BR>> Betreff: Re: AW: [WSIS CS-Plenary] Clarifications on the ITU informal consultation on WSIS implimentation<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Wolfgang,<BR>> Is this meeting open to all or is it only for selected<BR>> human resources already invited ?<BR>> Cette rencontre du début mai est-elle ouverte à tous<BR>> ou réservée à des invités selectionnés ?<BR>> <BR>> --- Wolfgang Kleinwächter<BR>> <WOLFGANG.KLEINWAECHTER@MEDIENKOMM.UNI-HALLE.DE><BR>> wrote:<BR>> <BR>> > FYI<BR>> > <BR>> > This is the agenda of the ITU meeting, may, 3 - 4,<BR>> > 2005. All documents can be downloaded for FREE.<BR>> > <BR>> > http://www.itu.int/council/wsis/wsis_WG.html<BR>> > <BR>> > Best<BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > wolfgang<BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> ><BR>> > ________________________________<BR>> ><BR>> > Von: plenary-admin@wsis-cs.org im Auftrag von Renata<BR>> > Bloem<BR>> > Gesendet: Mi 27.04.2005 18:18<BR>> > An: plenary@wsis-cs.org<BR>> > Betreff: RE: [WSIS CS-Plenary] Clarifications on the<BR>> > ITU informal consultation on WSIS implimentation<BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> > Hi Bill<BR>> ><BR>> > Thanks, for these clarifications. I was out of town<BR>> > and therefore did not<BR>> > speak to anybody in the ITU, but my own<BR>> > interpretation of the meeting was<BR>> > very similar to yours. I sent this yesterday to<BR>> > Tracey and the CSB, see<BR>> > below.<BR>> > I was, however, surprised to hear that they expected<BR>> > some CONGO people to<BR>> > attend. We were not asked to send this around as<BR>> > they had indicated of<BR>> > having very limited space.<BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> > >Dear Bertrand, Tracey and all,<BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> > >Having been in Nairobi last week and again away<BR>> > until today, let me just<BR>> > >join in this discussion.<BR>> > >When I received the invitation for this<BR>> > consultation, I saw it mainly as an<BR>> > >attempt of the ITU to position itself in WSIS and<BR>> > follow-up in relation to<BR>> > >its own constituencies, (if you look at the agenda<BR>> > of the following<BR>> > WG->WSIS)<BR>> > >other UN agencies and the UN in general<BR>> ><BR>> > >I have not been involved in this ITU WG-WSIS so<BR>> > far, but if you look at<BR>> > >some of their working papers, it becomes clear that<BR>> > they need to address<BR>> > >some of what the ITU should do in order to play a<BR>> > more substantive role in<BR>> > >WSIS follow up: e.g.<BR>> ><BR>> > >to align it more clearly with WSIS goals and<BR>> > objectives;<BR>> > >to reflect more relevantly the MDGs<BR>> > >to have closer engagement with CS, (!)even<BR>> > >to have closer cooperation with the rest of the UN<BR>> > >and probably a number of other to dos.<BR>> ><BR>> > >With other words, I see this exercise in the first<BR>> > place to get their house<BR>> > >in order to prepare better for becoming the<BR>> > whatever.overall coordinator of<BR>> > >the Plan of Action (according to the Russian<BR>> > proposal, not necessarily<BR>> > >endorsed by all governments).<BR>> ><BR>> > >So the very brief consultation with other<BR>> > stakeholders should therefore be<BR>> > >seen in my view in this in-house perspective as one<BR>> > (among many)<BR>> > >consultations for follow up. (UNESCO, UNCTAD, OECD<BR>> > all prepare many<BR>> > >meetings, including on follow-up)<BR>> ><BR>> > >I agree fully with Bertrand's letter (and thank you<BR>> > Bertrand!) to Janis<BR>> > >Karklins, in which way a more structured dialogue<BR>> > should take place. But I<BR>> > >would somewhat hesitate to send the other letter to<BR>> > Yuri Grin at this time,<BR>> > >precisely not to give more importance to that<BR>> > meeting than it has. However,<BR>> > >together with those who will attend, I will<BR>> > certainly raise the concerns.<BR>> ><BR>> > >Best<BR>> ><BR>> > >Renata<BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> > Renate Bloem<BR>> > President of the Conference of NGOs (CONGO)<BR>> > 11, Avenue de la Paix<BR>> > CH-1202 Geneva<BR>> > Tel: +41 22 301 1000<BR>> > Fax: +41 22 301 2000<BR>> > E-mil: rbloem@ngocongo.org<BR>> > Website: www.ngocongo.org<BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> > The Conference of NGOs (CONGO) is an international,<BR>> > membership association<BR>> > that facilitates the participation of NGOs in United<BR>> > Nations debates and<BR>> > decisions. Founded in 1948, CONGO's major objective<BR>> > is to ensure the<BR>> > presence of NGOs in exchanges among the world's<BR>> > governments and United<BR>> > Nations agencies on issues of global concern. For<BR>> > more information see our<BR>> > website at www.ngocongo.org<BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> > Hello Tracey,<BR>> ><BR>> > The ITU Council's Working Group on WSIS has long had<BR>> > a meeting scheduled on<BR>> > the 3rd and 4th<BR>> > http://www.itu.int/council/wsis/wsis_WG.html to talk<BR>> > about<BR>> > ITU's role in WSIS. The chair of the Council<BR>> > decided a couple of weeks ago<BR>> > to add on an informal meeting on the day prior to<BR>> > hear from other<BR>> > stakeholders, in part I think because ITU's been<BR>> > taking a lot of heat from<BR>> > CS about being a closed shop (especially in WGIG).<BR>> > Three key points:<BR>> ><BR>> > First, this is not a WSIS meeting; if it was it'd<BR>> > have been done by the WSIS<BR>> > secretariat and would have had to follow the<BR>> > relevant rules etc. It's an<BR>> > ITU meeting, about ITU's role in WSIS, and an<BR>> > informal one at that, under<BR>> > the authority of the chair, which is why it hasn't<BR>> > appeared on the ITU's<BR>> > website and calendar of events. Second, given the<BR>> > genesis described above,<BR>> > I wouldn't read too much into the way this was done<BR>> > in terms of setting<BR>> > precedents on CS participation in ITU, much less in<BR>> > WSIS. The chair of an<BR>> > ITU body can always call an informal meeting to hear<BR>> > what people have to say<BR>> > and invite whomever she or he wants.<BR>> ><BR>> > Third, I just spoke with the head of the SG's<BR>> > strategy and policy shop, and<BR>> > asked who was invited and why. He said that they'd<BR>> > simply pulled email<BR>> > addresses of people on the CS bureau, CS people<BR>> > based in Geneva like myself,<BR>> > and a few others they knew of. Originally they<BR>> > thought they'd have a room<BR>> > that seats thirty, so they were trying to keep it<BR>> > small. But there's been<BR>> > more demand than expected, so they've now moved it<BR>> > to a room that seats 100.<BR>> > He told me that about sixty people are registered at<BR>> > present, perhaps half<BR>> > of them from CS. I expressed surprise because I'm<BR>> > not aware that there's 30<BR>> > WSIS CS people in Geneva, and he said well there are<BR>> > CONGO people, some<BR>> > folks from out of town, etc. Didn't ask him to read<BR>> > a list. He emphasized<BR>> > that now that they have a bigger room, they can<BR>> > accommodate more people if<BR>> > others would like to register. I suggested they put<BR>> > the meeting<BR>> > announcement with a registration link somewhere<BR>> > visible<BR>> === message truncated ===<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Djilali Benamrane : dbenamrane@yahoo.com<BR>> Tel/fax : (227) 75 35 09 BP 11207 - Niamey - Niger<BR>> Tél/Fax : (331) 01 45 39 77 02 Paris - France<BR>> Page web sur le SMSI (mecanismes de financement) : en cours de construction<BR>> Page web sur l'Afrique et la globalisation : http://www.multimania.com/djilalibenamrane/<BR>> Groupe de discussion: http://www.egroups.com/list/afriqueglobalization<BR>> <BR>> __________________________________________________<BR>> Do You Yahoo!?<BR>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around<BR>> http://mail.yahoo.com<BR>> _______________________________________________<BR>> Plenary mailing list<BR>> Plenary@wsis-cs.org<BR>> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> _______________________________________________<BR>> Plenary mailing list<BR>> Plenary@wsis-cs.org<BR>> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary<BR>> <BR>> </BLOCKQUOTE>