<P>Dear Rik</P>
<P>The real CS doesn't see any "similarity" between the CCBI and gouvernments or intergouvernmental structures, or maybe you'll explain it to us during next PrepCom.</P>
<P>If we want to know the opinion, information or proposals of the CCBI and more generally of the private sector, we just surf on the net and visit their websites. At least this is more complete for our information. </P>
<P>Best regards</P>
<P>Jean-Louis Fullsack</P>
<P>CSDPTT<BR><BR></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #ff0000 2px solid">> Message du 25/05/05 15:19<BR>> De : "Rik Panganiban" <RIKP@EARTHLINK.NET><BR>> A : plenary@wsis-cs.org<BR>> Copie à : <BR>> Objet : Re: [WSIS CS-Plenary] CORRECTED VERSION:CCBI input on Chapters One and Four of Operational Part of WSIS-Tunis documents<BR>> <BR>> Jean Louis, et al,<BR>> <BR>> Whether we like it or not, the private sector are also "stakeholders" <BR>> in the WSIS. I think it's good for us to know what they are up to, <BR>> just as good strategy. Similarly, if there is a new EU or African <BR>> government initiative, I would expect us to share that information on <BR>> the CS plenary list, since it affects us all.<BR>> <BR>> Respectfully,<BR>> <BR>> Rik Panganiban<BR>> CONGO<BR>> <BR>> On May 25, 2005, at 8:59 AM, Jean-Louis FULLSACK wrote:<BR>> <BR>> > Sorry Karen<BR>> ><BR>> > The WSIS CS website isn't an advertising place for CCBI announcements. <BR>> > They have their own space and all the contributions are on the <BR>> > official ITU WSIS website.<BR>> ><BR>> > So, please let them know that.<BR>> ><BR>> > Best regards<BR>> ><BR>> > Jean-Louis Fullsack<BR>> ><BR>> > CSDPT-France<BR>> ><BR>> > <BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> > <BR>> >> > Message du 25/05/05 11:30<BR>> >> > De : "karen banks"<BR>> >> > A : plenary@wsis-cs.org<BR>> >> > Copie à :<BR>> >> > Objet : [WSIS CS-Plenary] CORRECTED VERSION:CCBI input on Chapters <BR>> >> One and Four of Operational Part of WSIS-Tunis documents<BR>> >> ><BR>> >> > dear all,<BR>> >> ><BR>> >> > passing this on at Ayesha Hassan's request.<BR>> >> ><BR>> >> > regards<BR>> >> > karen<BR>> >> ><BR>> >> > >Subject: CORRECTED VERSION:CCBI input on Chapters One and Four of<BR>> >> > >Operational Part of WSIS-Tunis documents<BR>> >> > >Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 10:25:46 +0200<BR>> >> > >From: "HASSAN Ayesha"<BR>> >> > >To: "HASSAN Ayesha" ,<BR>> >> > > Wolfgang Kleinwächter<BR>> >> > > ,<BR>> >> > > , ,<BR>> >> > > ,<BR>> >> > >Cc: "ZANNI May"<BR>> >> > ><BR>> >> > >Dear Wolfgang, Bertrand, Renate and Karen,<BR>> >> > ><BR>> >> > >A mistake was found and corrected in the text of the previous <BR>> >> version of<BR>> >> > >the CCBI input that I sent to you on 19 May.<BR>> >> > ><BR>> >> > >My apologies for any inconvenience this has caused.<BR>> >> > ><BR>> >> > >Specifically, on page 3 the comment read:<BR>> >> > ><BR>> >> > > E. CCBI supports [new 6k1,6k2 and 6k3], submitted by the ILO, <BR>> >> OECD, and<BR>> >> > > UNCTAD and proposes text for new 6k3 .> > <BR>> >> "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><BR>> >> > ><BR>> >> > >And the cut and paste of the full ILO, OECD, UNCTAD comments which<BR>> >> > >included a proposed new [new 6k4.] k4. was not deleted in the <BR>> >> drafting process.<BR>> >> > ><BR>> >> > >This has been fully re-circulated and resubmitted to the WSIS-ES <BR>> >> etc.<BR>> >> > ><BR>> >> > >I would appreciate it if you could circulate the corrected text to <BR>> >> anyone<BR>> >> > >that you sent the previous version to.<BR>> >> > ><BR>> >> > >Thank you for your anticipated understanding.<BR>> >> > ><BR>> >> > >Best regards,<BR>> >> > >Ayesha<BR>> >> > ><BR>> >> > [ FINAL FINAL CCBI input on Chapters One and Four of Operational <BR>> >> Part of WSIS-Tunis documents.pdf (106.0 Ko) ]<BR>> >> > [ (pas de nom de fichier) (0.0 Ko) ]<BR>> _______________________________________________<BR>> Plenary mailing list<BR>> Plenary@wsis-cs.org<BR>> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary<BR>> <BR>> </BLOCKQUOTE>
<P> </P>