<P>Dear all</P>
<P>Please, take a look to this document from Viviane Reding. She also mentions Internet gouvernance within the EU Transatlantic dialogue. Very softly as you can verify it ... on the last page.</P>
<P>All the best </P>
<P>Jean-Louis Fullsack</P>
<P>CSDPTT-France</P><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold size=4>
<P align=left>SPEECH/05/446</P></FONT><FONT face=Arial,Bold size=5>
<P align=left>Viviane Reding</P></B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=4>
<P align=left>Member of the European Commission responsible for Information</P>
<P align=left>Society and Media</P></FONT><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold size=6>
<P align=left>ICTs and Media a priority for the</P>
<P align=left>Commissioner's agenda, a crucial</P>
<P align=left>issue for the transatlantic relations</P></B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=4>
<P align=left>European Institute</P></FONT><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold size=4>
<P align=left>Washington DC, 13 July 2005</P></B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>
<P align=left>2</P></FONT><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold>
<P align=left>Introduction</P></B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>
<P align=left>As the first European Commissioner to be responsible for both the Information</P>
<P align=left>Society and Media Policies - that is for infrastructure and content -, I face the</P>
<P align=left>challenge but also have the unique opportunity to help to unleash all the potential of</P>
<P align=left>sectors which have become increasingly interdependent and have the capability to</P>
<P align=left>enrich one another.</P>
<P align=left>I would like to share with you some ideas about how Europe intends to deal with this</P>
<P align=left>new world of digital convergence and put it in the context of our remarkable</P>
<P align=left>transatlantic economic partnership.</P></FONT><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold>
<P align=left>The European Commission Information Society and Media agenda</P></B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>
<P align=left>The European Commission has placed economic growth and employment at the</P>
<P align=left>heart of its policy.</P>
<P align=left>On June 1</FONT><FONT face=Arial size=1>st</FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>, the Commission adopted my new initiative known as i2010, European</P>
<P align=left>Information Society 2010. Starting from this policy strategy paper, I intend to launch</P>
<P align=left>some very practical proposals. These will build on the competitive edge provided to</P>
<P align=left>all sectors of the economy through the take up and use of information and</P>
<P align=left>communication technologies (ICTs) to help us to achieve our goals. These initiatives</P>
<P align=left>rest on three pillars:</P>
<P align=left>1. The first pillar of i2010 seeks to establish a “common information space”, built on</P>
<P align=left>a common set of regulations that govern the supply of content and services - and</P>
<P align=left>the operation of networks - irrespective of the underlying technologies used.</P>
<P align=left>The convergence of information society and media services, traditional telecoms</P>
<P align=left>networks, the Internet, computers and other devices is becoming more and more a</P>
<P align=left>reality in Europe. However, regulators, both in the EU and the US, had been</P>
<P align=left>confronted with the constraints imposed by regulations that were originally designed</P>
<P align=left>for a bygone era. Policy convergence therefore needs to match that of the</P>
<P align=left>technologies and markets and provide consumers and industry legal certainty and</P>
<P align=left>confidence to invest and embrace new technologies: Policy convergence needs to</P>
<P align=left>match technology convergence.</P>
<P align=left>Here, the European Commission aims to keep regulation as light and as limited as</P>
<P align=left>possible. As competition among platforms increases, regulatory restrictions can be</P>
<P align=left>relaxed, leaving more to the self-governing, competitive forces of the market.</P>
<P align=left>In the near future, I will focus on a number of issues.</P>
<P align=left>First, with respect to content:</P>
<P align=left>A. The current regulation at Community level of broadcasting services dates back to</P>
<P align=left>1989. Soon, telecommunications providers will be able to deliver broadcasting</P>
<P align=left>services in a quality equal to traditional TV, while at the same time traditional</P>
<P align=left>content providers are entering the communications markets. >From a consumer</P>
<P align=left>perspective, it is becoming less and less important on which platform one receives</P>
<P align=left>movies or TV broadcasts. More and more, the consumer will watch or listen to</P>
<P align=left>audiovisual content anytime, anywhere, on all technical platforms (TV set, computer,</P>
<P align=left>mobile phone, personal digital assistant, etc.). It has become clear that to take</P>
<P align=left>account of these developments, the present EU rules on the “Television Without</P>
<P align=left>Frontiers Directive” need to be replaced by a more modern and flexible set of rules.</P>
<P align=left>3</P></FONT><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold size=3>
<P align=left>The European Commission has just made available five Issues Papers with</P>
<P align=left>policy options for the future legislative framework for audiovisual content</P>
<P align=left>services that will be subject to public consultation during the summer </B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>and</P>
<P align=left>discussed in a major conference on September 20-22, 2005, co-organized with the</P>
<P align=left>UK Presidency, in Liverpool. </FONT><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold size=3>This input will help the Commission to adopt a</P>
<P align=left>proposal for a new Directive at the end of 2005</B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>.</P>
<P align=left>B. The advent of film online offers immense opportunities to the film industry, both</P>
<P align=left>with regards to access to new audiences and to wider circulation of works, including</P>
<P align=left>on international markets. It also offers great opportunities for Internet Service</P>
<P align=left>Providers and access providers. High quality content is a driver for the broadband</P>
<P align=left>industry. However, the broadband industry’s business model cannot be built on a</P>
<P align=left>free rider system. There is an urgent need for a meaningful dialogue between the</P>
<P align=left>film industry and service providers to ensure that online distribution takes place</P>
<P align=left>through legal supply. Agreements between right holders and access providers will</P>
<P align=left>be beneficial – indeed essential – to both sides. I am therefore committed to support</P>
<P align=left>our stakeholders in their efforts to achieve this goal.</P>
<P align=left>Second, with respect to networks:</P>
<P align=left>A. The current regulatory framework for electronic communications networks has</P>
<P align=left>been widely implemented, with very concrete results in the market. Although</P>
<P align=left>implementation is not yet complete, we are determined to maintain the pressure on</P>
<P align=left>Member States to achieve this goal. Its flexibility, grounded in technology-neutrality</P>
<P align=left>and competition law principles, has provided regulators with a solid basis for</P>
<P align=left>handling the challenges as existing services are delivered over new infrastructures</P>
<P align=left>or in new ways.</P></FONT><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold size=3>
<P align=left>A review of the framework has started with a consultation on the future of</P>
<P align=left>universal service. We will continue with a broader consultation on the</P>
<P align=left>functioning of the existing framework in mid 2006.</P></B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>
<P align=left>B. New high speed wireless applications are driving demand for radio spectrum. </FONT><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold size=3>The</P>
<P align=left>European Commission will propose later this year a coherent strategy for</P>
<P align=left>efficient radio spectrum management </B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>that we wish to start implementing within</P>
<P align=left>the 2006 review of our e-communications framework. However, this reform will not</P>
<P align=left>be done in one day and it will require a mix of vertical and horizontal actions, some</P>
<P align=left>on a national level and some at EU level. For the time being, I would like to stress</P>
<P align=left>the work done to remove doubts in Europe about the opportunity of introducing</P>
<P align=left>spectrum trading as a way to empower “Industry” to make the strategic decisions on</P>
<P align=left>how to best use the radio spectrum.</P>
<P align=left>The challenge now is to introduce functioning markets without undermining the</P>
<P align=left>benefits of an integrated European market in electronic communications. </FONT><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold size=3>The</P>
<P align=left>Commission will launch soon a Communication on a market-based approach</P>
<P align=left>to spectrum. </B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>We also see the flexibility of spectrum use as an important issue. </FONT><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold size=3>A</P>
<P align=left>debate is under way on a common spectrum approach for all wireless</P>
<P align=left>transmission platforms providing electronic communications services </B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>as we</P>
<P align=left>need to address the convergence trends we see between broadcasting, mobile</P>
<P align=left>communications and broadband wireless access.</P>
<P align=left>If we succeed in adopting a flexible and coherent approach in Europe covering</P>
<P align=left>spectrum for all wireless access platforms, we will reduce constraints on access to</P>
<P align=left>spectrum, create a level playing field for investments, and make future spectrum</P>
<P align=left>markets more efficient. Here again there is a need to deal with our legacy and</P>
<P align=left>foresee a careful transition period, but the reward deserves such an effort..</P>
<P align=left>4</P>
<P align=left>Finally, </FONT><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold size=3>the European Commission </B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>also expects that by the beginning of 2010, the</P>
<P align=left>transition from analogue to digital broadcasting will be well advanced in the EU and</P></FONT><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold size=3>
<P align=left>is therefore proposing switching off analogue terrestrial television by 2012</P></B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>
<P align=left>freeing valuable resources and opening new possibilities.</P>
<P align=left>C. But all these efforts will be useless if we do not provide a secure environment for</P>
<P align=left>our communication networks, increasingly exposed to threats ranging from</P>
<P align=left>technology failures to malicious attacks. </FONT><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold size=3>The EU has recognized the need for a</P>
<P align=left>coordinated EU initiative, to complement national security initiatives. </B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>A major</P>
<P align=left>achievement is this respect was the establishment of the European Network and</P>
<P align=left>Information Security Agency, ENISA, in March 2004. ENISA will advise and assist</P>
<P align=left>the Commission and Member States on network and information security-related</P>
<P align=left>matters. </FONT><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold size=3>The Commission is working on a Strategy for a Secure Information</P>
<P align=left>Society</B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>. Within this context we are considering how to enhance the interoperability</P>
<P align=left>of security solutions and services; the need for further research addressing Internet</P>
<P align=left>stability and network and information security; and the means to raise awareness of</P>
<P align=left>users, to benchmark progress and to encourage the exchange of best practices.</P>
<P align=left>D. Let me also say a few words on an always delicate matter: </FONT><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold size=3>data retention</B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>. The</P>
<P align=left>Commission shares the overall objective of EU Member States to ensure that</P>
<P align=left>competent authorities throughout the EU should be able to access certain</P>
<P align=left>information related to electronic communications when necessary to fight crime and</P>
<P align=left>terrorism. However we need to avoid a patchwork of different data retention</P>
<P align=left>obligations in Europe. </FONT><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold size=3>Hence the Commission will shortly table a proposal </B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>which</P>
<P align=left>will make it possible to have a fully transparent debate, including in Parliament that</P>
<P align=left>will help to find the right balance not only in terms of privacy and consumer</P>
<P align=left>confidence, but also in terms of cost for the industry.</P>
<P align=left>2. The second pillar of i2010 follows the recognition that Europe’s future</P>
<P align=left>competitiveness depends on there being sufficient investment in research,</P>
<P align=left>particularly in ICT research. In terms of annual per capita investment in research,</P>
<P align=left>Europe is only investing 80€ per inhabitant whereas the USA is investing 350€ and</P>
<P align=left>Japan 400€. Europe should nearly double its annual investment in ICT research to</P>
<P align=left>fill the gap in per capita spending on research compared to the US, but more than</P>
<P align=left>half of this increase should come from private sector investment.</P>
<P align=left>3. Last but not least, the third pillar of i2010 policy aims to provide better services for</P>
<P align=left>citizens and to make our society more inclusive. Deployment of technology will help</P>
<P align=left>to meet growing demand for better health care, education and lifelong leaning, to</P>
<P align=left>provide a better quality of life for elderly people, security and social inclusion.</P></FONT><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold size=3>
<P align=left>The Commission plans in particular to issue a Communication on eaccessibility</P>
<P align=left>in the second half of 2005</B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>.</P>
<P align=left>While I am persuaded that these initiatives will contribute to create growth,</P>
<P align=left>employment and competitiveness, I also believe that EU-US relations have an</P>
<P align=left>important role to play to achieve these goals.</P>
<P align=left>5</P></FONT><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold>
<P align=left>EU-US economic integration: reinforcing the Transatlantic Economic</P>
<P align=left>Partnership</P></B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>
<P align=left>Indeed, a simple look at any recent set of statistics shows the magnitude of the</P>
<P align=left>economic integration achieved between the European Union and the United States.</P>
<P align=left>Even if journalists often prefer to report on trade disputes, these account for only a</P>
<P align=left>fraction of transatlantic commerce. In reality, the overwhelming majority of bilateral</P>
<P align=left>trade between the EU and US is dispute-free. But that is just part of the story,</P>
<P align=left>according to recent studies trade constitutes a relatively small portion of total</P>
<P align=left>transatlantic economic activity (less than 20 percent): investment in each other’s</P>
<P align=left>economies is what really drives innovation, jobs, markets, and business activity. I</P>
<P align=left>will spare you however the statistics which you have heard (and memorized, I am</P>
<P align=left>sure !) from every EU speaker.</P>
<P align=left>However, despite our impressive bilateral economic ties, several obstacles continue</P>
<P align=left>to hinder our bilateral trade and investment, mainly in the regulatory area.</P>
<P align=left>In addition, both the EU and the US are also confronted with serious internal and</P>
<P align=left>external economic challenges. While the US has high budget and trade deficits, the</P>
<P align=left>EU must address its disappointing growth rate and we both must face competitive</P>
<P align=left>pressures from strongly growing economies such as China and India.</P>
<P align=left>To address these issues EU and US leaders adopted a number of initiatives at the</P>
<P align=left>recent EU-US Summit held in Washington on 20 June.</P></FONT><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold size=3>
<P align=left>Strengthening EU-US Regulatory Cooperation</P></B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>
<P align=left>Firstly, we have taken a number of steps to reinforce our regulatory cooperation,</P>
<P align=left>building and expanding our already successful joint initiatives. Building on the EUUS</P>
<P align=left>Guidelines on Regulatory Cooperation and Transparency adopted in 2002 we</P>
<P align=left>have agreed that we will:</P>
<P align=left>- establish a senior-level dialogue, tasked with the drafting, in the next six months,</P>
<P align=left>of work programs;</P>
<P align=left>- establish a High Level Regulatory Co-operation Forum to promote regulatory</P>
<P align=left>cooperation between senior regulators;</P>
<P align=left>- an OMB-European Commission dialogue to address, subject to mutual</P>
<P align=left>agreement, topics such as good regulatory practices, transparency provisions</P>
<P align=left>and public consultation, impact assessment methodologies and risk assessment</P>
<P align=left>methodologies;</P>
<P align=left>- implement a concrete “Roadmap for Regulatory Cooperation” and reinforce other</P>
<P align=left>successful sectoral dialogues;</P>
<P align=left>- encourage the discussion of standards issues;</P>
<P align=left>- identify resources and mechanisms to support exchanges for regulatory experts;</P>
<P align=left>- encourage legislators on both sides of the Atlantic to meet regularly.</P>
<P align=left>In addition, we have also agreed to discuss any significant remaining obstacles to</P>
<P align=left>transatlantic investment and we have recognized the value of stakeholders’</P>
<P align=left>contributions giving EU and US regulators the possibility to organize meetings with</P>
<P align=left>stakeholders as appropriate.</P>
<P align=left>6</P></FONT><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold>
<P align=left>Cooperating on innovation and new technologies</P></B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>
<P align=left>Secondly, we are keenly aware of the </FONT><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold size=3>importance of innovation and new</P>
<P align=left>technologies for the future of our economies</B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>. We have identified </FONT><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold size=3>several areas</P>
<P align=left>for future cooperation</B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>: </FONT><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold size=3>research and development; information </B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>and</P></FONT><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold size=3>
<P align=left>communications technologies</B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>; </FONT><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold size=3>health and medical technologies; eaccessibility</P></B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>
<P align=left>for the disabled, elderly and other citizens with accessibility issues;</P>
<P align=left>deployment of key innovative technologies such as </FONT><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold size=3>broadband</B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>, and </FONT><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold size=3>radio</P>
<P align=left>frequency identification devices; </B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>collaboration on development and take-up of</P></FONT><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold size=3>
<P align=left>Telematics for intelligent vehicles</B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>; </FONT><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold size=3>cyber-security</B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>, </FONT><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold size=3>international redress for</P>
<P align=left>international internet purchases</B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>; </FONT><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold size=3>spam, spyware and other malicious software</B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>,</P>
<P align=left>just to mention a few.</P>
<P align=left>Over the next six months, we will work with the US to establish concrete work</P>
<P align=left>programs, which will include objectives and timelines to review and measure</P>
<P align=left>regularly progress.</P>
<P align=left>In this context, I am particularly worried about the lack of effectiveness in the fight</P>
<P align=left>against </FONT><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold size=3>spam</B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>. Spam destroys the confidence of the consumers in the Internet. It is</P>
<P align=left>in that respect a real danger and I believe therefore that all governments must act</P>
<P align=left>more actively against companies that facilitate the dissemination of spam</P>
<P align=left>throughout the world. The World Summit on the Information Society in Tunis in</P>
<P align=left>November will be an important venue to discuss this issue.</P>
<P align=left>In addition, we have agreed on a specific Declaration on </FONT><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold size=3>Intellectual Property</P>
<P align=left>Rights </B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>that addresses the need to support their effective protection and</P>
<P align=left>enforcement at home and abroad, in line with the highest international standards.</P>
<P align=left>Piracy is in my view a crucial issue where the potential for cooperation already</P>
<P align=left>exists.</P></FONT><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold>
<P align=left>Global partners</P></B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>
<P align=left>Finally, the EU and the US will continue working to bring to the rest of the world</P>
<P align=left>many of the benefits that they try to achieve for their own people.</P>
<P align=left>On the economic side, concluding the </FONT><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold size=3>WTO Doha Development Agenda </B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>is our</P>
<P align=left>overriding priority, but other issues will provide us with the opportunity to address</P>
<P align=left>new challenges.</P>
<P align=left>Both the US and the EU have played an important role within the </FONT><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold size=3>World Summit on</P>
<P align=left>Information Society </B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>which will take place in Tunis in November.</P>
<P align=left>The UN Working Group on Internet Governance has now completed its work and a</P>
<P align=left>final report is due in the coming days. The report will be a significant contribution to</P>
<P align=left>the preparations for the discussions on Internet governance, in Tunis and after</P>
<P align=left>Tunis.</P>
<P align=left>The EU has recently signalled its priorities for </FONT><B><FONT face=Arial,Bold size=3>Internet governance</B></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>. These are:</P>
<P align=left>- the need to ensure the continued security and stability of the Internet;</P>
<P align=left>- the need to find ways to deal effectively with SPAM;</P>
<P align=left>- the increased internationalisation of the management of core Internet resources;</P>
<P align=left>- the need to ensure that developing countries can better participate in this</P>
<P align=left>governance.</P>
<P align=left>7</P>
<P align=left>The continued stability and security of the Internet is essential. To date, the Internet</P>
<P align=left>has been provided almost entirely by private sector initiative and investment. We</P>
<P align=left>recognise this and applaud it. At the same time, more and more governments are</P>
<P align=left>asking themselves what they can do to ensure that this critical resource remains</P>
<P align=left>reliable and dependable.</P>
<P align=left>I take note of the recent declaration of the US administration concerning certain</P>
<P align=left>aspects of Internet governance. For Europe, it is crucial that the future approach to</P>
<P align=left>Internet governance is led by the principles of efficiency and openness, and not by</P>
<P align=left>considerations of internal policy. At the same time, I have taken note with interest</P>
<P align=left>that the US Government has reaffirmed its willingness to pursue an “on-going</P>
<P align=left>dialogue with all stakeholders” on Internet governance.</P>
<P align=left>The EU feels that there is indeed room for better exploiting the potential for publicprivate</P>
<P align=left>partnership. We should build on existing governance structures. However,</P>
<P align=left>there appears to be no appropriate global fora where governments and other</P>
<P align=left>stakeholders can come together to solve common challenges. Importantly, this</P>
<P align=left>includes security and stability, as well as SPAM and cyber-crime. Where we have</P>
<P align=left>effective bodies, such as the OECD, these are not inclusive enough to allow for the</P>
<P align=left>participation of developing countries. It is crucial that all parts of the world become</P>
<P align=left>more active in these fields of security and stability and better enforce existing</P>
<P align=left>legislation.</P>
<P align=left>Considering the economic importance of the Internet for Europe, notably its</P>
<P align=left>increasing weight in our trade relations with our main economic partners, I believe</P>
<P align=left>that it would be in our interest to jointly work on realistic solutions and I am confident</P>
<P align=left>that we are going to succeed.</P>
<P align=left>Of course, it is clear in my view that reflection on an improved, more effective and</P>
<P align=left>inclusive model should not hamper the day-to-day operation of the Internet, and not</P>
<P align=left>undermine the good work carried out by organisations such as ICANN. A key</P>
<P align=left>objective must be to help support private sector initiative and investment and to</P>
<P align=left>promote innovation.</P>
<P align=left>In the coming months we will explore how to implement the different lines for</P>
<P align=left>cooperation identified in June; at the same time that we remain open to further</P>
<P align=left>ideas, since the EU-US Transatlantic Partnership is an on-going reality where a new</P>
<P align=left>chapter is always being opened. I look forward to continuing to work with my US</P>
<P align=left>colleagues on many of our common challenges.</P>
<P align=left>Thank you for your attention.</P></FONT>