<P>Dear Robert</P>
<P>Remember : we weren't very successful in our "wording contributions" to the official documents during phase 1, nor were we more successful since the beginning of phase 2. </P>
<P>By the way to asses the impact of the CS contributions in these documents we need again the wise survey services of the "Kleinwaechter boys". Please Wolfgang, mobilise them for PrepCom-3 so that the CS will have a clear view on its influence in the WSIS course !</P>
<P>Jean-Louis Fullsack<BR><BR><BR><BR></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #ff0000 2px solid">> Message du 30/08/05 14:38<BR>> De : "Robert Guerra" <RGUERRA@LISTS.PRIVATERRA.ORG><BR>> A : "wsis-cs-plenary Plenary" <PLENARY@WSIS-CS.ORG><BR>> Copie à : <BR>> Objet : Re: [WSIS CS-Plenary] Submitting comments/documents - Procedural comment...<BR>> <BR>> [Please note that by using 'REPLY', your response goes to the entire list. Kindly use individual addresses for responses intended for specific people. Your cooperation is highly appreciated] <BR>> _______________________________________<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> My point was trying to make, was it would be good to have CS group <BR>> submit specific revisions to the texts being drafted in the (govt) <BR>> plenary. Not too many groups did so at PC2, and would be good that it <BR>> happened at PC3.<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> regards,<BR>> <BR>> Robert<BR>> <BR>> --<BR>> Robert Guerra <RGUERRA@PRIVATERRA.ORG><BR>> Managing Director, Privaterra <HTTP: www.privaterra.org><BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> ><BR>> <BR>> _______________________________________________<BR>> Plenary mailing list<BR>> Plenary@wsis-cs.org<BR>> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary<BR>> <BR>> </BLOCKQUOTE>