<DIV>Is it necessary to make Chinese question of the humans right a point of about a day of Prepcom3? it is really before first! let us hope for what it is not before taste?<BR><BR><B><I>Bertrand de La Chapelle <bdelachapelle@gmail.com></I></B> a écrit :
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">
<DIV>I cannot imagine that the Human Rights Caucus isn't already considering preparing such a statement right away ?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Bertrand <BR><BR> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=gmail_quote>On 9/19/05, <B class=gmail_sendername>Tracey Naughton</B> <<A href="mailto:tracey@traceynaughton.com">tracey@traceynaughton.com</A>> wrote:</SPAN>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=gmail_quote style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">[Please note that by using 'REPLY', your response goes to the entire list. Kindly use individual addresses for responses intended for specific people] <BR><BR>Click <A href="http://wsis.funredes.org/plenary/">http://wsis.funredes.org/plenary/</A> to access automatic translation of this message!<BR>_______________________________________<BR><BR>Milton et all,<BR><BR>I was thinking the same thing last night. I prepared the <BR>accreditation request for the Media Institute of Southern Africa,<BR>when I worked there. While the submission was thoughtfully and<BR>carefully prepared I have no doubt at all that hours more work could<BR>have gone into it to ensure that all details of the organisation and <BR>its sources of income were included. This was not a matter of non-<BR>disclosure, but an approach of adequate disclosure to present the<BR>nature of work and main income sources
of the organisation. The<BR>submission passed through without any further interrogation, let <BR>alone to the extent that Human Rights in China's submission is being<BR>examined.<BR><BR>Clearly the Human Rights in China application has been singled out<BR>for particular and microscopic attention for political reasons. <BR><BR>I think it would be appropriate to formulate a statement noting that<BR>the level of interrogation of this 'file' is not in proportion to<BR>that afforded to other 'files'.<BR><BR>Tracey Naughton<BR><BR><BR>_______________________________________________ <BR>Plenary mailing list<BR><A href="mailto:Plenary@wsis-cs.org">Plenary@wsis-cs.org</A><BR><A href="http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary">http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary</A><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR><BR><DIV>
<UL>
<LI>
<DIV align=right><EM><FONT face="comic sans ms" color=#ff0000><STRONG>lejuriste <IMG src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/mesg/tsmileys2/33.gif"></STRONG></FONT></EM></DIV></LI></UL></DIV><p>
<hr size=1>
<b><font color=#FF0000>Appel audio GRATUIT</font> partout dans le monde</b> avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger<br>
<a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/messenger/mail_taglines/default/*http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com">Téléchargez le ici !</a>