<P>Dear Bernard, Bertrand and all </P>
<P>I apologize for this mail exchange on the CS plenary list. Actually my reply to Bernard was intended to be strictly personal, but I was mistaken in sending it to the plenary list, using instinctly this infamous "reply" button. In addition I fully agree Bernard's opinion Therefore I apologieze to Bertrand for my strong opinion on his person being expressed "publicly". It isn't the place here for that. </P>
<P>However, the weakness of the CS working group on follow-up and implementaion (the WG-2 in PrepCom-3 jargon) was expressed before by some other CS members on the list (Renate was among them) especially in terms of a clear CS position statement and relevant proposals for the WSIS follow-up after Tunis. </P>
<P>I thank all of you for your comprehension</P>
<P>Best </P>
<P>Jean-Louis Fullsack, CSDPTT</P>
<P>> Message du 02/12/05 14:27<BR>> De : "Bernard Lang" <BERNARD.LANG@DATCHA.NET><BR>> A : plenary@wsis-cs.org<BR>> Copie à : <BR>> Objet : Re: [WSIS CS-Plenary] Additional Info Media Tunis<BR>> <BR>> [Please note that by using 'REPLY', your response goes to the entire list. Kindly use individual addresses for responses intended for specific people]<BR>> <BR>> Click http://wsis.funredes.org/plenary/ to access automatic translation of this message!<BR>> _______________________________________<BR>> <BR>> Dear Jean-Louis<BR>> <BR>> Thanks for the support.<BR>> <BR>> Actually, I am not trying to pass judgement on anyone, and do not feel<BR>> qualified for that ... but I believe some rules should be followed if<BR>> we want spokepeople to be representative, especially since it is so<BR>> difficult to speak.<BR>> <BR>> Furthermore, I feel it was not a time for negociation, but for<BR>> speaking out and loud, which is not his type of action.<BR>> <BR>> Regarding myself ... I am French.<BR>> <BR>> Saludos<BR>> <BR>> Bernard<BR>> <BR></P>