<HTML><BODY style="word-wrap: break-word; -khtml-nbsp-mode: space; -khtml-line-break: after-white-space; "><DIV>Hi,</DIV><DIV><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></DIV>Just a point of clarification:<DIV><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></DIV><DIV> does this mean that the CSB is now closed, null and void? </DIV><DIV><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></DIV><DIV>if so, i agree, and it can be reconstituted if and when needed . </DIV><DIV><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></DIV><DIV>if on the other hand it still has some current and continuing function (for example if civil society is organizing itself for IGF and ECOSOC activities), then it seems reasonable to deal with people's issues.</DIV><DIV><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></DIV><DIV>a.</DIV><DIV><BR><DIV><DIV>On 24 jan 2006, at 07.46, <A href="mailto:KovenRonald@aol.com">KovenRonald@aol.com</A> wrote:</DIV><BR class="Apple-interchange-newline"><BLOCKQUOTE type="cite"><FONT face="arial,helvetica"><FONT color="#000000" face="Geneva" family="SANSSERIF" size="2">Dear All --<BR> <BR> I heartily agree with Tracey's view about reform of the CS Bureau. I think that spending time an energy on that now would be beating a dead horse.<BR> <BR> Best, Rony Koven</FONT><FONT color="#000000" face="Geneva" family="SANSSERIF" size="2"></FONT></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR></DIV></BODY></HTML>