SV: [Privsec] Response: Consumer Protection and privacy
Rikke Frank Joergensen
rfj at humanrights.dk
Thu Feb 17 08:12:57 GMT 2005
it doesnt make sense to me. i am not sure what he actually means. privacy standards are general standards that apply to any given context where intrusion into the private sphere is at stake. so naturally privacy standards apply even if IG only concerns personal data protection and not for instance intrusion into your home etc.
Rikke
-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: privsec-bounces at wsis-cs.org på vegne af karen banks
Sendt: on 16-02-2005 22:48
Til: privsec at wsis-cs.org
Emne: [Privsec] Response: Consumer Protection and privacy
hi
here's the response from peng hwa - slightly edited following group
protocol ;) - 'both views' refer to ours and another inputs he received -
i'll send the revised paper as soon as we have it..
what do you think about the phrase 'internet governance related aspects of
privacy'
karen
>Subject: Re: [Wgig-consum] How do we proceed?
>Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 02:37:51 +0800
>From: "Ang Peng Hwa (Assoc Prof)" <TPHANG at ntu.edu.sg>
>To: <karenb at gn.apc.org>, <Wgig-consum at wgig.org>
>
>Thanks Karen.
>
[...
>I'll take both views and incorporate what I consider to be relevant into
>the re-draft. The privacy advocates take a broad view of privacy; we have
>to take the internet-governance related aspects of privacy.
>
>Regards,
>Ang Peng Hwa
_______________________________________________
Privsec mailing list
Privsec at wsis-cs.org
http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/privsec
More information about the Privsec
mailing list