[Privsec] WGIG:Issues list with separate rows for each institution

[karen banks]

hi gus

well, i was thinking about the institutions/mechanisms that are involved in 
IG related funcstions for cybercrime/cyberseruciry and the consumer 
protection papers - as outlined in the matrix attached..

and, whether they are

>>also, please start giving some ideas as to whether these fora are:
>>- multi-stakeholder (gov, private sector, civil society)
>>- transparent
>>- accountable
>>- democratic
>>- coordinated

so yes, below is kind of what i'm looking for..

karen

At 15:28 17/02/2005, Gus Hosein wrote:
>I don't quite understand what you're looking for.
>
>If you want to know what fora are doing things on privacy...
>
>Privacy Protection:
>- OECD (limited access by NGOs, non-democratic)
>- CoE (based on ECHR and the COnvention on data protection of 1980, but no 
>active work; democratic (has a parliament), some multi-stakeholder (they 
>do have observer NGOs))
>- European Commission Article 29 Working Group (none of the good things of 
>accontable, multi-stakeholder, etc., but it is a good thing, so that is an 
>irony)
>- Some work at APEC but I don't know it (no access by NGOs to my 
>knowledge, non-democratic)
>
>Privacy Invasion (related to Internet issues)
>- G8 (none of the good stuff)
>- CoE
>- APEC
>- Interpol (none of hte good stuff)
>
>
>Privacy Invasion (non-Internet, but tech related)
>- ICAO (none of the good stuff)
>- OSCE (democratic with a parliament (I am pretty sure at least), possibly 
>multi-stakeholder through observer (but not sure))
>- ASEAN
>
>At 11:15 17/02/2005, karen banks wrote:
>>hi
>>
>>we're discussing this now - can you have a look through and check the 
>>fora against the issues we're interested in?
>>
>>also, please start giving some ideas as to whether these fora are:
>>- multi-stakeholder (gov, private sector, civil society)
>>- transparent
>>- accountable
>>- democratic
>>- coordinated
>>
>>feel free to write decscriptive notes - ie, the COE is not a 
>>multi-stakholder, CS reps are prevented from, are unable to, etc etc
>>
>>ta lots
>>
>>karen
>>
>>>Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:49:35 +0100 (CET)
>>>From: "Vittorio Bertola" <vb at bertola.eu.org>
>>>To: wgig-discuss at wgig.org
>>>Subject: [wgig-discuss] Issues list with separate rows for each institution
>>>
>>>Attached, if it may help the current discussion.
>>>--
>>>vb.               [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<------
>>>http://bertola.eu.org/  <- Vecchio sito, nuovo toblòg...
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>wgig-discuss mailing list
>>>wgig-discuss at wgig.org
>>>http://wgig.org/mailman/listinfo/wgig-discuss_wgig.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Privsec mailing list
>>Privsec at wsis-cs.org
>>http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/privsec