[Privsec] WGIG:Issues list with separate rows for each institution

[karen banks]

hi

it would be really great, if someone could just redo the rows associated 
with cybercrime/cybersecurity and consumer protection.. we're working on 
the draft report most of today... which will go to the ITU for translation 
on monday and negotitated by governments on thursday 24th.. (which is when 
we need to have our

but, this is ongoing, so if it's too much today (the WGIG meeting finishes 
today) we can carry online..

karen

At 16:55 17/02/2005, Ralf Bendrath wrote:
>>well, i was thinking about the institutions/mechanisms that are
>>involved in IG related funcstions for cybercrime/cyberseruciry and the
>>consumer protection papers - as outlined in the matrix attached..
>Looking at the xls file, I wondered what WIPO has to do with
>cybersecurity? If they mean DRM - that is not network and information
>security, but technical enforcement of private rules.
>
>I would add FIRST there as a multi-stakeholder entity active in the
>technical security field. Not sure how open it is, as it's more a
>coordination mechanism that does not create binding rules.
>
>There is also ENISA and other international or regional security
>initiatives, but they mainly focus on coordination and info-sharing. It
>might be a good case for issues where binding rules and enforcement are
>not really neccessary.
>
>On Privacy-invasion, you can add ETSI/ILETS (European Telecommunications
>Standards Institute and its International Law Enforcement Technology
>Seminar (?)), who have defined eavesdropping standards for
>telecommunication systems. None of the good stuff re opennesshere, of course.
>
>Ralf
>_______________________________________________
>Privsec mailing list
>Privsec at wsis-cs.org
>http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/privsec