[Privsec] Re: Lawful Access - Canadian Consultation

[Robert Guerra]

Gus:

At the consultation we found out that we hadn't received all the 
documents - additional documents regarding mutual legal assistance 
were presented. We were told they'd be sent by courier - will have to 
see if in fact they get sent asap, or if we have to obtain them via 
FOI requests.

will keep you posted.

robert

At 2:56 PM +0000 3/11/05, Gus Hosein wrote:
>Robert...
>
>I am surprised by the rush to legislate on this, and the short 
>'consultation' even though, as you say, the proposals sound 
>progressive.
>
>There are always little catches, such as how they regard SMS, 
>web-traffic data.  And on the CoE convention, they are still missing 
>out the mutual legal assistance components which would cause 
>trouble, I imagine.
>
>I'd like to have the chance to go through the actual proposals in more detail.
>
>Keep well...
>
>gus
>
>n.b. I took Bruce Schneier off the 'cc' list because I didn't want 
>to spam him with this stuff; if I did so inappropriately, I 
>apologise and please feel free to forward to him.
>
>At 13:58 10/03/2005, Robert Guerra wrote:
>>If that ends up to be the case, and parliament adopts the law by 
>>the fall (which is not something that can be predicted) - then 
>>Canada will be in a situation of having the required legislation to 
>>implement the Council of europe convention on cybercrime....
>>
>>So what next  ?
>>
>>Given the relatively short deadline (that of end of march), i would 
>>be great to find a way to get those on this list able to learn more 
>>of the developments and have some  comments submitted in an 
>>official way.
>>
>>I would be keen to facilitate this - what do you think?


-- 
###
Robert Guerra <rguerra at privaterra.org>
Privaterra - <http://www.privaterra.org>