[Values-ethics] proposals to NomCom

[Laina Raveendran Greene]

Dear Shaila,
 
Good point but we should be also more focused on people who are very
involved and informed about values and ethics as their agenda, hence my
suggestion of Liberato and Max. Also gender caucus will already be giving
their list of names. For gender balance and people involved in these issues,
we could add Bahiyyih Chauffers and/or perhaps one more from the Brahma
Kumaris as well. In any case, if we have no clarity on process of agreeing
to names and the process of submitting, it may be that you and the others
will have to self-nominate anyway.
 
Liberato and Bahiyyih- for sure we should at minimum submit your names as
you are the co-convenors so kindly take this up and see how you want to
handle this. Max is very involved in IGF discussions and could help serve as
our point of contact for submitting names. Process again would help give us
some clarity on how to be involved. 
 
Max or Liberato- could you help?
 
Best,
Laina

  _____  

From: values-ethics-admin at wsis-cs.org
[mailto:values-ethics-admin at wsis-cs.org] On Behalf Of Shaila Mistry
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 8:52 AM
To: values-ethics at wsis-cs.org
Subject: Re: [Values-ethics] proposals to NomCom


Greetings Everyone
 
I am very pleased  that two names are being proposed and have confidence in
them.  However, I would like to ensure that we ourselves do not fall into
the trap of gender bias. In this respect I would like to volunteer to serve
on the NomCom.I know that most of you are cognizant with my background.
 
Please add my name as well.
 
Shaila Rao Mistry


Laina Raveendran Greene <laina at getit.org> wrote: 

I would like to propose that Max Senges and Liberato be the names we submit
forward to NomCom from values and ethics group. If no objections, we should
do this ASAP.
 
Laina


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/pipermail/values-ethics/attachments/20060412/86d24747/attachment.htm