[Values-ethics] FW: [governance] NomCom nomination statments - To publish or not toPublish

[Laina Raveendran Greene]

-----Original Message-----
From: governance-bounces at lists.cpsr.org
[mailto:governance-bounces at lists.cpsr.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 12:42 PM
To: Meryem Marzouki
Cc: governance at lists.cpsr.org; hr-wsis at iris.sgdg.org
Subject: Re: [governance] NomCom nomination statments - To publish or not
toPublish

Hi,


On 10 apr 2006, at 04.34, Meryem Marzouki wrote:

> Also, I may have missed some explanation, but what would be the result 
> of the nominating process ? A consensus on the 15 final names, an 
> ordered list of all nominated people, classified by the number of 
> "votes" rceived from individual members of the nomcom ? i.e. How the 
> nomcom would proceed?
> If there is an ordered list of nominated people, then it must be 
> published too.

I am not sure how the Nomcom will proceed process wise internally, but the
idea that i believed was accepted by this caucus was  that a list of names,
in the area of 15, will be forwarded the the IGF secretariat as the IGC
endorsed set of candidates for the MAG.

I believe that this process has no effect, one way or anther, on other
nomination processes that may be going on elsewhere in civil society.  My
assumption is the the IGF secretariat will receive all of the names,
un-endorsed, singly endorsed and multiply endorsed and make its selections
based on its own criteria.

a.

_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance