[Lac] Re: [governance] list of recommended CS names for WGIG
Adam Peake
ajp at glocom.ac.jp
Tue Sep 14 06:37:30 BST 2004
At 8:02 PM -0300 9/13/04, Beatriz Busaniche wrote:
>El lun, 13-09-2004 a las 14:33, karen banks escribió:
>
>>
>> valeria has also confirmed that there hasn't been discussion in the
>> lac at wsis-cs.org space - apologies for any confusion.
>
>Hi all
>we've started a discution in the last few hours in the latin american
>caucus,
>
>could someone tell us how much time do we have to make our inputs?
>and to present candidates?
By September 20 please. And information about the
format for the nomination and how below.
Thank you,
Adam
At 5:53 PM +0900 9/7/04, Adam Peake wrote:
>Please follow the format described below and send to this address:
>
><igov at tla.crepundia.net>
>
>We will collate all nominations.
>
>Please also send to the civil society plenary
>list if you wish, but suggest you strip any
>personal contact information before doing so.
>
>The format below only asks for information about
>the caucus or working group submitting the
>nomination(s), we should also have something
>about any individual making a nomination: who
>you are, your relationship with the nominee
>(typical conflict of interest issues.) This will
>not be necessary for a self-nomination :-)
>
>
>Format for submitting nomination(s)
>
>In making your caucuses/working groups
>recommendation, we request that you submit the
>following information, which will be passed on
>to Mr. Kummer, with the names of the candidates.
>Individual members of the CS plenary may also
>submit nominations. Individuals should also
>submit their nominations based on the criteria
>explained below.
>
>- Reliable contact information for the
>candidate; i.e. email, telephone, fax and postal
>address.
>
>- A statement indicating the qualities that the
>person would bring to the WGIG. While no
>particular content is being required, it is
>recommended that this section include a
>discussion of the concerns mentioned above and a
>discussion of the experience and perspective the
>candidate would bring to the WGIG discussions.
>
>- A statement of the person's governance related
>affiliations. That is information such as:
>which sector does the person belong to
>(government, industry or civil society), what
>caucuses/working groups do they participate in,
>employer, national background, and language
>skills.
>
>- An indication from the candidate that they
>understand the work load they are volunteering
>for and that they are available during the
>expected period of deliberations.
>
>- A short statement about your caucus/working
>group. Include information about the group's
>background and history, membership (numbers),
>and achievements or other information you think
>relevant. Please give a URL for a website if you
>have one.
>
>It is recommended that these statements be no
>more then two pages in length. Candidate
>information will be collated and published on
>the Internet
><http://www.too-much.tv/internet_governance/>
>(with candidates personal contact information
>removed.)
>
>END
>_______
>Thank you all
>
>
>Hola
>hemos iniciado una discusión al respecto en las últimas horas en el
>caucus latinoamericano.
>
>Podría alguien decirnos cuánto tiempo tenemos para hacer nuestros
>aportes y presentar candidatos?
>
>gracias
>
>Beatriz
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>governance mailing list
>governance at lists.cpsr.org
>https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance
More information about the Lac
mailing list