[Lac] WGIG

[Diego Saravia]

> >I'm not sure I agree. While spam is indeed a growing problem, I'm not
> >sure I'd like a "governance" body decide for me what I should think is
> >spam, and what not. The potential for censorship is too large. Spam is
> >most likely (and much more legitimately) to be dealt with by
> >technological measures under each user's control anyway.
> >  

Spam is not a problem, its a feature. I love all that stuff, and when I get
bored I dont look at it.



> I disagree. SPAM is an IG issue as well, since SPAM tends to 
> originate from certain areas of the world, for products from certain 
> areas of the world. So at a meta level, it must be addressed. Not 
> *solved*, but a stance must be taken on it.
> 

certain areas???, I do not believe that, do you have information that relates
spam intensity with host/users density, country by country?


> >If spam is to become an issue in the discussion of Internet Governance,
> >I think our position ought to be to exclude it from the discussion and
> >leave it to the users and their ISPs.

there is not such thing as internet governance.
who can control internet?, how?, by what means?


>  Let's leave something for people to do. Things get
> boring in working groups, an animated discussion on sexual 
> enhancement drugs might make for a good break. ;-)
> 

hapy fucking, sorry, hacking.


-- 
Diego Saravia 
dsa at unsa.edu.ar