[Mmwg] Suggestion for consultation

[carlos a. afonso]

Sorry, my mistake, Karen just read a capacity-building proposal she
posted recently, not the APC response. The APC text is posted in the IGF
site's responses to the questionnaire, as are other contributions from
civil society groups.

--c.a.

-----Original Message-----
From: "carlos a. afonso" <ca at rits.org.br>
To: "Milton Mueller" <mueller at syr.edu>, jam at jacquelinemorris.com,
mmwg at wsis-cs.org
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:22:34 -0300
Subject: Re: [Mmwg] Suggestion for consultation

> In my view, the caucus declaration read today by Jeanette, and the
> APC
> response to the IGF questionnaire (and presented also today by Karen
> B),
> are what could be done on the part of CS in time for this initial
> consultation round. We might have missed the boat, but the issue we
> plan
> to deal with is extremely important and still needs good proposals as
> part of the IGF __process__, so let us continue and not despair... :)
> 
> Sorry, Bertrand, but given the voting system setup already prepared
> and
> the need to move forward, I suggest we just go ahead and vote.
> 
> frt rgds
> 
> --c.a.