[Mmwg] Suggestion for consultation

[Luc Faubert]

I agree with Milton. I think it's out of the question that we can agree on anything--even basic principles--today or tomorrow. Our ideal window of opportunity to submit something to the IGF was the current meeting, and given this, before we continue we need to define our purpose, as some on this list have been repeatedly asking for a while.
 
If IGF consultations continue after this meeting, as will probably happen, then it may be useful to continue working on a mechanism.
 
Bertrand:
Thanks for your answer.
 
 
- Luc Faubert
ISOC Québec

________________________________

From: mmwg-bounces at wsis-cs.org on behalf of Milton Mueller
Sent: Thu 2006-02-16 10:07
To: jam at jacquelinemorris.com; mmwg at wsis-cs.org
Subject: Re: [Mmwg] Suggestion for consultation



Jacqueline:
To me it seems that the value of this group is its ability to focus on one specific and more detailed issue related to the Forum, namely its "MM" or "multistakeholder modalities." If we have something to say about that, we should have developed it two weeks ago and put it on the intgovforum site. If not (and frankly I think we missed the boat), we should remain silent and not rush into something for the sake of having something to say.

>>> Jacqueline Morris <jam at jacquelinemorris.com> 2/14/2006 11:55:07 PM >>>
Hi
Rather than working on a total mechanism and not saying anything in public
until we get that sorted, would it be interesting to ppl for us to pull
together some BASIC PRINCIPLES as a first step that we can present at the
consultation that we think that any mechanism needs to subscribe to? We have
articulated some, I believe, and that might be an easy consensus first step.

--
Jacqueline Morris
www.carnivalondenet.com
T&T Music and videos online

_______________________________________________
mmwg mailing list
mmwg at wsis-cs.org
http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mmwg


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/pipermail/mmwg/attachments/20060216/eabd0874/attachment.htm