[Mmwg] IGF Input

[Luc Faubert]

Robert,
 
All groups overlap. We've seen people from all houses sitting in national delegations seats. Overlaps are common: Gov & Biz, Gov & T, Biz & T, A & CS, CS and Biz. People will choose their house when they decide to run as Committee member.
 
So it becomes a question of balance between all houses in the Committee. My proposition a while back was to have govs on one side and everybody else on the other, but this seems unrealistic at this point.
 
If we're going to have houses, we need one for T&A. Otherwise, it's like letting gov reps discuss policy for bridge structures without engineers participating. Just makes no sense. This is not a new idea. It has been voiced by many from all houses in both WSIS and IGF, including our Canadian government -- and ISOC of course. I think it'll fly,
 
- Luc Faubert
ISOC Québec
 

________________________________

From: mmwg-bounces at wsis-cs.org on behalf of Robert Guerra
Sent: Fri 2006-02-24 10:21
To: mmwg at wsis-cs.org
Subject: Re: [Mmwg] IGF Input



Luc Faubert wrote:
> Sorry Avri and all. Should've been "Gov, Biz, CS and T&A".
> 
> T&A is Technical and Academic.
> 
> You're right about the priorities. We have enough on our hands now,
>

Thought agree with the groups, it does beg the question - how does one
in CS know if they are in the "CS" group, or the Technical and Academic
group.

There is an issue of potential "double representation" that will have to
be worked out at some point..

regards

Robert
_______________________________________________
mmwg mailing list
mmwg at wsis-cs.org
http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mmwg


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/pipermail/mmwg/attachments/20060224/d39d07ae/attachment.htm