[Mmwg] IGF Input

William Drake drake at hei.unige.ch
Fri Feb 24 16:02:56 GMT 2006


Hi,

The T&A issue has been debated at length in WGIG, the IG Caucus, and to some extent here, and is consistent with the ISOC position in the IGF consultations that "THE Internet community" should be recognized as a fourth stakeholder grouping.   Some of us have been strongly opposed to creating this fourth category, some thought it a good idea, others didn't care much either way.  Without digging through list archives I wouldn't venture to characterize the split between those positions, but it is fair to say that it's never been a point on which there's remotely been consensus.   Since peoples' positions probably haven't changed, we won't resolve it this weekend before providing an IGF input, and we don't have to, it's hardly central to Desai's questions.

Best,

Bill





  -----Original Message-----
  From: mmwg-bounces at wsis-cs.org [mailto:mmwg-bounces at wsis-cs.org]On Behalf Of Luc Faubert
  Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 3:40 PM
  To: Avri Doria
  Cc: mmwg at wsis-cs.org
  Subject: RE: [Mmwg] IGF Input


  Sorry Avri and all. Should've been "Gov, Biz, CS and T&A".

  T&A is Technical and Academic.

  You're right about the priorities. We have enough on our hands now,

  - Luc Faubert
  ISOC Québec


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  From: Avri Doria [mailto:avri at psg.com]
  Sent: Fri 2006-02-24 09:04
  To: Luc Faubert
  Cc: mmwg at wsis-cs.org
  Subject: Re: [Mmwg] IGF Input




  On 24 feb 2006, at 14.51, Luc Faubert wrote:


    5 regions x 1 rep from 4 groups (Gov, Biz, PS and T&A) = 20 members.


  did you mean biz and CS (PS is private sector usually understood as biz)
  and T&A is probably not the american T&A  :-)
  - do you mean the Internet technical and operational community and academics?


    Second question was about priority of themes to be discussed in Athens. Will we submit a prioritized list of themes ?




  is that a modalities question and thus one for this group?  or is that more of a governance caucus question? 




  a.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/pipermail/mmwg/attachments/20060224/04bd658c/attachment.html


More information about the mmwg mailing list