VS: [Mmwg] IGF Input

[Avri Doria]

On 24 feb 2006, at 17.17, Vittorio Bertola wrote:

> Moreover, it's the first time I see this proposal of two different
> groups, I think it's too complex - I would stick to one group only.

the bipartite proposal has been uttered (not here, but in general)  
several times

in some incarnations is it two separate bureaus with one being  
Countries and one the rest of us

and in some incarnations, is it more in terms of a bicameral notion  
where the Multi stakeholder  body has two sections, and two  
appointment procedures, the countries and the rest of us.

while i see some disadvantages in it (esp the 1 voice versus many  
voices issue - how often do CS and PS agree especially on issues like  
which topics should be on the agenda), one advantage it has is in  
removing the need to figure out exactly which houses get to  
participate and who belongs to which house.

a.