[Mmwg] Mechanism proposition
Robert Guerra
rguerra at lists.privaterra.org
Sat Jan 14 23:31:41 GMT 2006
On 13-Jan-06, at 10:39 AM, Luc Faubert wrote:
>
>
> NOTES
>
> Inidividual representation
> No individuals representing themselves are allowed in the forum.
> The forum is a place for communities of interest to negociate and
> decide on issues. Individuals wishing to be heard will have to
> either lobby a party or create their own organization and seek
> accreditation. The requirement of 1000 members is intended to
> prevent fly-by-nighters and puts an emphasis on the need to
> organize in order to participate in fora.
>
Luc:
I will send more comments later this weekend.
However, at this point I want to say that I strongly disagree with
your point that a min. # of 1000 members is needed. Many of the NGOs
that participated in the WSIS process did not meet the threshold you
mention, yet they were active and caused a significant and positive
impact.
Another example is WGIG - the CS members that were selected didn't
come from large organizations, but small ones. WGIG was seen to work
well, and as such is an example worth building on.
In summary, The forum should be as open as possible and allowing
groups of all size - large and small - should be a core value put
forward by CS.
regards
Robert
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/pipermail/mmwg/attachments/20060114/e3abc004/attachment.html
More information about the mmwg
mailing list