[Mmwg] IGF mechanism 5.0

[Jaeyoun Kim (Peter)]

This sounds good.

It might be a compromise solution for individuals to participate in IGF.


Regards,
Jaeyoun Kim (Peter)

On 1/21/06, Yulia Timofeeva <airetg at gmail.com> wrote:
> Actually it could develop in a workable solution. Since many parties are
> reluctant to see individuals participating as "individuals" we could think
> of some special name for them ("experts" or something else) so that it would
> be clear for everyone that it's not just any person from the street.
> Then of course we have to offer some criteria or procedure to make sure that
> the person deserves the title.
>
> Yulia
>
>
>
>
> On 1/20/06, Avri Doria <avri at psg.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 20 jan 2006, at 16.27, Danny Younger wrote:
> >
> > > As a way to bridge the gap between our positions,
> > > would you perhaps feel more comfortable creating an
> > > accreditation category for known "experts" that would
> > > allow such contributors to pass readily through the
> > > front door?
> >
> > i tend to support the idea of enabling individuals to participate.
> > but i have an issue with figuring out how one defines, identifies and
> > accredits 'experts' and would not be happy to see it limited to experts.
> >
> > a.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mmwg mailing list
> > mmwg at wsis-cs.org
> > http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mmwg
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmwg mailing list
> mmwg at wsis-cs.org
> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mmwg
>
>
>