[Mmwg] IGF mechanism 5.0

[Yulia Timofeeva]

Actually it could develop in a workable solution. Since many parties are
reluctant to see individuals participating as "individuals" we could think
of some special name for them ("experts" or something else) so that it would
be clear for everyone that it's not just any person from the street.
Then of course we have to offer some criteria or procedure to make sure that
the person deserves the title.

Yulia



On 1/20/06, Avri Doria <avri at psg.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 20 jan 2006, at 16.27, Danny Younger wrote:
>
> > As a way to bridge the gap between our positions,
> > would you perhaps feel more comfortable creating an
> > accreditation category for known "experts" that would
> > allow such contributors to pass readily through the
> > front door?
>
> i tend to support the idea of enabling individuals to participate.
> but i have an issue with figuring out how one defines, identifies and
> accredits 'experts' and would not be happy to see it limited to experts.
>
> a.
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmwg mailing list
> mmwg at wsis-cs.org
> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mmwg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/pipermail/mmwg/attachments/20060120/e8922d1e/attachment.html