[Mmwg] Re: IGF mechanism 5.0

[Taran Rampersad]

Milton Mueller wrote:
> Yes, good point. ARIN (with which I am most familiar) handles real resources; yet it doesn't fear open meetings. IGF has a purely advisory status and yet Vittorio is talking about the Plenary as if it were some hugely dangerous thiing.
>   
I agree with Vittorio.

And...

I am curious how many people are on this list, and would suggest that 
there be time for participation on the list. I appreciate that some of 
you are bringing forward experience, but I am uncertain that everyone is 
yet involved, and I've also noted that a lot of decisions appear to have 
come to conclusion.

What I would like first clarified is what our timetable is. Maybe it's 
written somewhere, maybe not, but I don't have it right now. That would 
really be a good start to all of this, I think. It lends a reality to 
the situation. Maybe I'm the only one who sees things this way, but I 
would suggest a more concrete approach - and that involves defining this 
within time.

-- 
Taran Rampersad
Presently in: San Fernando, Trinidad and Tobago
cnd at knowprose.com

Looking for contracts/work!
http://www.knowprose.com/node/9786

New!: http://www.OpenDepth.com
http://www.knowprose.com
http://www.digitaldivide.net/profile/Taran

"Criticize by creating." — Michelangelo