[Mmwg] And then they were ten

[Taran Rampersad]

Hello, everyone. I'm fine with the charter. Collaboration and voting can
be done in various ways, the single vote email method should work with a
small group - with a deadline for the vote (and related discussion for
the vote).

Carlos Afonso wrote:

> --- c.a.'s initial alert: reply to sender just replies to the
> individual sender, not to the list -- use reply to all to reach the
> list ---

And removing the initial sender from the send box allows discussion to
stay on the list.

> I am fine with the charter, considering we all are "dialectic" persons
> comfortable with any changes we might detect as necessary along the
> journey.
>
> Netiquette -- I am absolutely in favor. Please draft something.

Concur. There are plenty of samples running around. Here's RFC 1855, one
of the 'standards' : http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt

> Leadership -- how about thinking of "moderatorship/facilitatorship"?
> It is actually more work if we think of it, but more democratic. I
> think we should have at least two, so when one cannot be present we
> count on the other...

Concur. I see leadership as a

>
> Why not you in the meantime as our leader/moderator/facilitator, at
> least to get us to cruise speed?

concur.


-- 
Taran Rampersad
Presently in: San Fernando, Trinidad and Tobago
cnd at knowprose.com

Looking for a gig!
http://www.knowprose.com/node/9786

http://www.knowprose.com
http://www.digitaldivide.net/profile/Taran

Coming on January 1st, 2006: http://www.OpenDepth.com

"Criticize by creating." — Michelangelo