[Mmwg] And then they were ten

[l.d.misek-falkoff falkoff]

Greetings; nice place to be, interesting posts,  and just wondering.

Referring to:

<begin quote> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
On 14 dec 2005, at 10.53, Max Senges wrote:

> - figure out what our immediate agenda is, e.g.:
>    - MSH discussion and description?
> [Max] sorry but what is MSH ?- mission statement?


sorry, multistakeholder.  this is one of the terms we use a lot, but
has never had a real working definition.  i think that having MSH as
our goal and the motivation for our recommendations, we should have a
clear view of what it means and what the scope is.

<end quote>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

LDMF Comment and Query:

A recurring typology of who is "in the set" of multistakeholders goes
something like:

Governments, Civil Society including but not only Non-Governmental
Organizations (NGOs), Private Sector, Parliamentarians.

Perhaps I missed one or two (?), but for purposes of discussion and without
nominating this as the only possible top level list of course, what might
you think of adding:

*Individuals.*

[And all that might entail]

Sending best professional and personal regards,  Linda M F.
Dr. L. D. Misek-Falkoff
*Respectful Interfaces.*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/pipermail/mmwg/attachments/20051215/51f0c3b1/attachment.html