MSH was Re: [Mmwg] And then they were ten

[Avri Doria]

On 15 dec 2005, at 16.51, l.d.misek-falkoff falkoff wrote:

> LDMF Comment and Query:
>
> A recurring typology of who is "in the set" of multistakeholders  
> goes something like:
>
> Governments, Civil Society including but not only Non-Governmental  
> Organizations (NGOs),

i think the academicians fall into this category as well

> Private Sector, Parliamentarians.

The Tunis Agenda (35) includes:

Intergovernmental Orgs
International Organizations

and recognizes in  (36)  and recommends in (72) the  academic  
scientific and technical communities.

Another group that is arguing for inclusion is the " Internet  
Technical Community"  Or what I prefer to call it the "Internet  
Technical Community"  In some sense this lines up with the academic,  
scientific and technical commnities, but is some sense, because of  
its policy roles (speaking specifically of ICANN and maybe ISOC here)  
somewhat wider then that definition.


>
> Perhaps I missed one or two (?), but for purposes of discussion and  
> without nominating this as the only possible top level list of  
> course, what might you think of adding:
>
> Individuals.
>
> [And all that might entail]

Yes, they need to be discussed as well.  though I still find many  
aspects of how unaffiliated individuals can be included very  
confusing as long as we are not intending that they should be  
represented by some sort of [ad-hoc] affinity grouping.

a.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/pipermail/mmwg/attachments/20051215/84e20f7c/attachment.htm