AW: [Mmwg] RE: Next Steps

[Wolfgang Kleinwächter]

Bill, I have asked this question several times on the list. There was no clear answer. If the IGC pushes the debate and prepares the statement for March, 31, 2006, this is okay and probably more effective than if it comes via the MMWG. Anyhow, we need a leader for the IGC, at least an "Interim Leader" for the time period from now to end of October 2006. 
 
We need also a procedure for the collection of names of candidates for an IGF group. This can not be done by the MMWG. 
 
Best
 
w
 
 

________________________________

Von: mmwg-bounces at wsis-cs.org im Auftrag von William Drake
Gesendet: Mi 15.03.2006 12:19
An: mmwg at wsis-cs.org
Betreff: [Mmwg] RE: Next Steps



Hi Wolfgang,


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wolfgang Kleinwächter
> [mailto:wolfgang.kleinwaechter at medienkomm.uni-halle.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 10:35 AM

> The first step is to identify the priority issues. Here the
> dateline is March, 31, 2006. Jackie and I have asked several
> times for your "Top Three" but the response was rather low so
> far. I have on my list at the moment the following six "prirority issues"

Did we decide that this was appropriately within the WG mandate?   I thought
there was sentiment that it wasn't and we should concentrate on substantive
recs in the caucus.

Clarify, please?

BD




_______________________________________________
mmwg mailing list
mmwg at wsis-cs.org
http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mmwg