[Mmwg] RE: Next Steps

[Luc Faubert]

Jacqueline and Wolfgang,
I thought like Bill that we had agreed on MMWG not submitting a proposal on priorities. This makes sense to me. I think we should concentrate on IGF's working model. I propose that we skip the priorities discussion, leave it to IGC and other groups, and concentrate on a working model for the IGF.
 
 
Wolfgang,
Your proposal to finalize a working model before the next IGF committee working session seems wise to me. It would probably be good to have it done some weeks prior to the meeting so we have a chance to evangelize the model to the appropriate people prior to the meeting.
 
I will be on the road for the next two months, with what I fear will be only sporadic connections, but I will do my best to contribute to this list,
 
 
- Luc Faubert
ISOC Québec
 

________________________________

From: mmwg-bounces at wsis-cs.org on behalf of Wolfgang Kleinwächter
Sent: Wed 2006-03-15 06:26
To: William Drake; mmwg at wsis-cs.org
Subject: AW: [Mmwg] RE: Next Steps



Bill, I have asked this question several times on the list. There was no clear answer. If the IGC pushes the debate and prepares the statement for March, 31, 2006, this is okay and probably more effective than if it comes via the MMWG. Anyhow, we need a leader for the IGC, at least an "Interim Leader" for the time period from now to end of October 2006.

We need also a procedure for the collection of names of candidates for an IGF group. This can not be done by the MMWG.

Best

w



________________________________

Von: mmwg-bounces at wsis-cs.org im Auftrag von William Drake
Gesendet: Mi 15.03.2006 12:19
An: mmwg at wsis-cs.org
Betreff: [Mmwg] RE: Next Steps



Hi Wolfgang,


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wolfgang Kleinwächter
> [mailto:wolfgang.kleinwaechter at medienkomm.uni-halle.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 10:35 AM

> The first step is to identify the priority issues. Here the
> dateline is March, 31, 2006. Jackie and I have asked several
> times for your "Top Three" but the response was rather low so
> far. I have on my list at the moment the following six "prirority issues"

Did we decide that this was appropriately within the WG mandate?   I thought
there was sentiment that it wasn't and we should concentrate on substantive
recs in the caucus.

Clarify, please?

BD




_______________________________________________
mmwg mailing list
mmwg at wsis-cs.org
http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mmwg


_______________________________________________
mmwg mailing list
mmwg at wsis-cs.org
http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mmwg


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/pipermail/mmwg/attachments/20060315/dc705009/attachment.htm